I dig the 43 the way it is. Would love to shoot up some ammo with a XDS. Deal breaker with that grip safety though.
I'll go ahead and say it I will be first in line to buy one. I was a beta tester for the 365 and was thoroughly disappointed in it as I could not make it through a full magazine without a malfunction. I can't wait for this gun I am so excited, just like I was for the 365, but hopefully this one will run.
The thumb safety would be a plus for me for deep conceal. I'm not a fan of the safety on a carry but I would be concealing a 43 if it had one.
I've had 2 malfunctions in about 422 rds in my p365. My glock 43 has probably 1000 rounds through it with 0 malfunctions. I may have to look into a 43x.
1. I wish my Sig 365 had a safety: I'm that old-fashioned.
2. Same type of profile with both guns for me; Glocks never failed to go bang (42, 43, 26).
3. I tried to find a CZ that I could carry b/c they have the safety and/or a long D/A first pull (Rami, PCR), but the size/weight of the Sig 365 won out.
4. Hoping someone will make a similar gun with a safety one day.
<br>It’s a Taurus but it has a safety...<br>
<a href="https://www.taurususa.com/product-details.cfm?id=929&category=Pistol&toggle=tp&breadcrumbseries=CC1" target="_blank">https://www.taurususa.com/product-details.cfm?id=929&category=Pistol&toggle=tp&breadcrumbseries=CC1</a>
I was reading over on arfcom couple days ago about the 43x and 48. A guy on the board chimed in and stated he got to shoot both already and confirmed they're real
1. I wish my Sig 365 had a safety: I'm that old-fashioned.
2. Same type of profile with both guns for me; Glocks never failed to go bang (42, 43, 26).
3. I tried to find a CZ that I could carry b/c they have the safety and/or a long D/A first pull (Rami, PCR), but the size/weight of the Sig 365 won out.
4. Hoping someone will make a similar gun with a safety one day.
Holy wall of text