ChristianPatriot
Grandmaster
So the only real difference is initial purchase cost difference and an extra two years of ownership. They both depreciate to roughly $2500.
Uh yeah I think that's what they're getting at. I'd bet the used one with 40k on the clock is significantly cheaper than the brand new one.
I found several Malibu's with a quick search that are only a couple years old with low miles in the $12k range vs the $20k he's gonna pay.
Pay almost twice as much for a car that's gonna be worth the same in 8-10 years? No thanks.
Last edited: