See my other reply on this.Interesting the Fox News link has preview but the NRA links say age verification, like a minor accessing NRA postings is wrong? Crazy…
See my other reply on this.Interesting the Fox News link has preview but the NRA links say age verification, like a minor accessing NRA postings is wrong? Crazy…
Regarding the FRAC lawsuit in North Dakota . . .. . .
Court Listener Minute Entries for:
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc. v. Garland (1:23-cv-00024), District Court, D. North Dakota
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66802066/firearms-regulatory-accountability-coalition-inc-v-garland/
There is no entry whatsoever in all 82 of them (as of Friday May 26th) with a motion to add NRA as a Plaintiff. Nor is there any motion for leave by the NRA to file an amicus brief. In short, NRA is nowhere to be found anywhere in that lawsuit.
Additional analysis...
Verbosity is one of Mark W. Smith's specialties.TL;dl version?
I find him dry and unwatchable.Verbosity is one of Mark W. Smith's specialties.
I like him. But not 30+ minutes of him. Sheesh.I find him dry and unwatchable.
Sadly, but yes. I like these in the weeds videos, but I'm weird.Ok, so did anyone fall on the sword and watch the video? I’d like a bullet point list, please…preferably written in crayon.
I'm watching it twice and making notes to post later, but would give a massive caution they're my interpretation of his missive. He redundantly repeats himself repetitively, reiterating the same points repetitiously. Will post later today if possible. What I've gleaned thus far is positive and good.Ok, so did anyone fall on the sword and watch the video? I’d like a bullet point list, please…preferably written in crayon.
Thanks in advance, sir. My ability to comprehend of ‘law stuff’ is basically non-existent and it really helps to have things interpreted to me by someone that understands it more.I'm watching it twice and making notes to post later, but would give a massive caution they're my interpretation of his missive. He redundantly repeats himself repetitively, reiterating the same points repetitiously. Will post later today if possible. What I've gleaned thus far is positive and good.
That said, he is one of he most knowledgeable on Constitutional Case Law, especially as it applies to Second Amendment and SCOTUS. He connects dots with other significant and landmark cases that dealt with the same basic legal issues and principles, even though they're not about 2nd Amendment protected rights. I turn on a redundancy filter when listening to him.
And I don't think that is accidental. Lawyers write stuff in an effort that only other lawyers can understand it.Thanks in advance, sir. My ability to comprehend of ‘law stuff’ is basically non-existent and it really helps to have things interpreted to me by someone that understands it more.
I second that; was about to post the same thing myself.I would also like to thank @JAL on providing 'detail and clarity' during this season of stupidity.
If NRA is somehow attached to this lawsuit in any meaningful manner, please enlighten me. I've been unable to unearth it in the trove of documents filed with and issued by the court.
So......can I keep my brace? ..if I had one....Will I need to register it?
...if I had one?/?
I dont do legal E stuff well.
I've done some digging through the entire court Minute Entries (which show all the filings, hearings, orders, etc.) in the FRAC v BATF lawsuit (District of North Dakota). Did some digging through all the financial disclosures required for 501(c)(#) non-profits. I believe NRA is a c4 and FRAC is a c6, primarily the IRS 990's.As posted up thread, there seems to be some press releases and some news coverage that the NRA backing includes funding and legal support of cases, particularly the FRAC v Garland case. Has your research indicated this to be incorrect? Posing this as a question to you; not being argumentative.
Honestly, if I was a plantiff in one of these brace lawsuits, I would not want the NRA also named. They are too much a magnet for the left media but I'd be happy to take their money and counsel...
As in the following press release: https://www.nraila.org/articles/20230209/nra-challenges-atf-brace-rule