Some ideas. . .
The availability of spoons and forks does not make people fat.
Neither does the availability of any tool cause any behavior.
Additionally, there's no positive correlation between so called "gun control" laws and the sort of thing to which she refers. What there a huge school shooting problem in 1890? How about 1920? Yet, there was comparatively no federal regulation of firearms ownership back then. Yet, today, with 20,000+ firearms laws, there's a "problem?"
Her phraseology, "The problem is . . .," indicates a narrow, simplistic understanding of a complex issue.
None of which is likely to make any difference in her position since it's most likely based on emotion rather than critical thought.
The availability of spoons and forks does not make people fat.
Neither does the availability of any tool cause any behavior.
Additionally, there's no positive correlation between so called "gun control" laws and the sort of thing to which she refers. What there a huge school shooting problem in 1890? How about 1920? Yet, there was comparatively no federal regulation of firearms ownership back then. Yet, today, with 20,000+ firearms laws, there's a "problem?"
Her phraseology, "The problem is . . .," indicates a narrow, simplistic understanding of a complex issue.
None of which is likely to make any difference in her position since it's most likely based on emotion rather than critical thought.
Last edited: