CulpeperMM
Master
uh,... no.Chicago can have Gary South Bend and Ft. Wayne, we'll take from Springfield south.
uh,... no.Chicago can have Gary South Bend and Ft. Wayne, we'll take from Springfield south.
uh,... no.
wow...i want to move now.
And just an fyi
(2) A firearm that has a bore diameter greater than 1 1/2 inches and that uses smokeless powder, not black powder, as a propellant;
that is a 38 mm rifle. A 50cal is 12.7mm. That is a damn big gun they can make.So they can make 37mm rifles and under by that rule?
Chicago can have Gary South Bend and Ft. Wayne, we'll take from Springfield south.
Hell no! Tell Illinois we'll take Chicago off their hands. We take their economy, Springfield Illinois can keep their politicians.
49 states to go!
Now we need to find a state legislator to introduce this bill in Indiana.
The claim they've always used is that even the raw materials, if mined/grown/procured/whatever in one state and used in another constitute "interstate commerce" and therefore fall under federal jurisdiction. Really reaching, IMHO, but unfortunately, they've been doing it so long, it's now precedent... Gonna be awfully difficult to override it. Alternatively, if the Montana thing goes through and is challenged and upheld, there may be a chink in the armor.How can the feds regulate even a firearm transfer in our state if on the transaction receipt it would say something like, "firearm to be retained for use in Indiana" or something like that? Just cause it was made with parts imported from other states? But those parts arent firearms yet!
That is Montana's economic stimulas plan. How many people will travel to Montana for firearms related purchases? What about gun manufacturers looking for a gun friendly state?