- Jan 12, 2012
- 27,286
- 113
Are the defendants saying that evidence was "created?" Seems like there's way too many people offering testimony about the bad actions of the Hammond's for it to be a sham.
Kut (thinks somebody would have blown the whistle by now, if it was a sham)
Why the restriction on favorable witnesses if it isn't a sham? Please don't tell me that it doesn't happen. I have seen it happen closer to home over far less important things (i.e., a judge not allowing one side to call favorable witnesses).