Says updated in January…Again you are going by 118th
Says updated in January…Again you are going by 118th
I thought this thread was about the Speaker of the House. Oh well…does prove my point about the attention span of the average voter. They need to add Ritalin to those chemtrails.
Meanwhile…
Nothing will ever advance without compromise. Nothing.So compromising away our constitution and the bill of rights is okay?
Maybe for you but not for me.
Trump speakership would be terrible. Of course people will vote against it. Let’s push our most toxic brand to the front and show people we really are a Trump cult.Pipe dream in my opinion. Been wrong before, but I'd be willing to bet that there are enough "republican" house members to vote against him, probably in bigger numbers than the eight that voted against McCarthy. There's a whole neo-con wing of members to whom the idea of a Trump speakership would make them a bit queasy, I'd wager to guess.
Oh, sure, just start pointing fingers now...INGO Mike got us side tracked defending Young.
Chuck Norris said years ago the democrats have moved so far left they are communist and republicans have moved so far left they are now the democrats. Very few good men out there to choose from, they are all bought out. Or get bought out. What have republicans done to balance the budget and stop the spending and start bringing the debt down? You got a few in DC calling out the warning and pointing out the RINO’s. And you just want to against them and vote for same people. So far we been $33 Trillion wrong. It’s a big spending club and me and you ain’t in it. Keep voting for the Todd Young’s and Holcombs. You only get to pick who the elites put up.How does enabling the Democrat help the situation? You're tired of compromise so you're actively seeking nothing over settling for something? That's all or nothing thinking and not conducive to positive outcomes.
Sure, those are great reasons to vote against him in the Primary. How exactly is electing a Democrat in the General in anyway better? Do you really think the Democrat will be more in line with what you want or are you just throwing a political tantrum?
That’s who I’m talking about.Sounds all good but the root problem is not really the politicians you speak of, it is the voters that select them…
It will never happen. I posted this previously. Unless the GOP conference wants to change the rules, Trump cannot occupy a Republican leadership role while under indictment.Pipe dream in my opinion. Been wrong before, but I'd be willing to bet that there are enough "republican" house members to vote against him, probably in bigger numbers than the eight that voted against McCarthy. There's a whole neo-con wing of members to whom the idea of a Trump speakership would make them a bit queasy, I'd wager to guess.
I saw you post that, and agree. I do believe, however, that my posit also holds true. Even if there were no felony indictments, I think there would be enough "friendly fire" to sink any attempt to get him into the position.It will never happen. I posted this previously. Unless the GOP conference wants to change the rules, Trump cannot occupy a Republican leadership role while under indictment.
Even if Trump had full Republican support in the House, Rule 26 of the GOP Conference states, "A member of the Republican Leadership shall step aside if indicted for a felony for which a sentence of two or more years imprisonment may be imposed."
I agree with what you posted and along with what I posted talk of Trump becoming speaker is just that.I saw you post that, and agree. I do believe, however, that my posit also holds true. Even if there were no felony indictments, I think there would be enough "friendly fire" to sink any attempt to get him into the position.
Nope.Because you don’t make progress without a price. We have allowed them to twist our representation into what it is. You don’t get to correct it without a penalty.
Me too! At least, for President.Where the hell is Lauren Boebert! Indiana wasn’t represented as well, looks like I’ll be voting Libertarian for the most part. Done voting for rinos.
And it's way past time for that.This is almost as cool as voting for a new Pope.
Is it just me, or is the word "traitor" tossed out by conservatives as freely as "racist" is by liberals?
Hopefully a commemorative edition Krink47 will they come out with a Trump AK47 if he gets back in
It's like a message in a bottle, sending a 'message' no one is likely to read or care much about if they do - but, hey; 4% is +1 on George Washington or somethingLet me see if I understand this correctly. You're upset that the Republicans didn't give you everything you want so you're going to waste your votes on people that have little chance to win and are not likely to give you any more of what you want than the Republicans you're upset about, thus helping the Democrats, who are not only unlikely to give you what you want but are likely to take what you have, get elected?
I guess I just don't see the value in throwing such a political tantrum. It sure does help explain why we are where we're at though.