OK - so, not even 1 person voted for Romney accidentally either.
This, may be the best argument yet
OK - so, not even 1 person voted for Romney accidentally either.
I think you would have a better chance of flipping a quarter and it coming up heads 542 times than you would have of 542 people all voting for the same person in any neighborhood.
Statistically impossible - there is that better?
Statistics are part of math.
Stop arguing over semantics.
Given the locations of these places, I might say it wasn't outside the realm of possibility that it happened. Philly? Cleveland? What's the demographic makeup of these precincts? Both places have high concentrations of democratic voters.
I trust that Printcraft will post a link to the disaffected Romney voters in these precincts. I look forward to reading the story.
OK - so, not even 1 person voted for Romney accidentally either.
Now, assuming you are correct on every. single. person. voting in those areas were voting obama....... No one accidentally voted for Romney?
Not one?
Mistaken votes? Is that a logical conclusion based on evidence, or is that the only logical conclusion you can come to, based on what you WANT to see? Voting for the person that you want to vote for is not particularly difficult. We see zero error rates in vastly more complicated tasks every day.
Show me the disaffected Romney voters, or go back to posting cute little pictures and GIFs.
Apparently there is not a single racist who is registered to vote in any of those 59 voting districts? That alone seems mathematically impossibleHow is this mathematically impossible?
There is no such thing as 100% in any human controlled event. That alone should trigger analysis.
............
Show me the disaffected Romney voters, or go back to posting cute little pictures and GIFs.
Pick an example of a similar process that involves a typical batch of poll workers, union toads, party hardliners or govt workers in similar working conditions, using temps. Who are you kidding? Without redundancy built into the process you can't do 100%.We see zero error rates in vastly more complicated tasks every day.
Somebody cheated too hard there?
Apparently there is not a single racist who is registered to vote in any of those 59 voting districts? That alone seems mathematically impossible