Oh you didn't need to spell anything out. I know what it's all about. I didn't think I needed to use purple.
KG1 - I'm sorry about that, I misinterpreted your post
Oh you didn't need to spell anything out. I know what it's all about. I didn't think I needed to use purple.
No need. Were on the same side. Cheers.KG1 - I'm sorry about that, I misinterpreted your post
Too hard headed and uneducated on firearms to begin to listen.
Funny... wife and I just had this same conversation about her brother in Jersey. Clueless does not even begin to cover him.
Funny... wife and I just had this same conversation about her brother in Jersey. Clueless does not even begin to cover him.
Malik also means ‘king.’ Therefore, when the name of the female terrorist was revealed as Tashfeen Malik, it seemed wrong.
I searched around for her background and the names of her parents. Those were found, but the parents’ names were different from her’s and the implicit question in my mind remained: would a Pakistani girl raised in Saudi Arabia be named Malik?
I raised this question to my Facebook friends and one of them came through with a link from Palestinian ex-terrorist, ex-Muslim Walid Shoebat. Tashfeen Malik is a man’s name. Oh and not just any man.
Tashfeen Malik (King) is a nom de guerre for a Muslim Jihadist from the annals of Muslim history. As he is known to Muslims “تاشفين ملك الموحدين” Tashfeen Malik Al-Muahideen, in English: Tafhseen King of the Unitarians (Muslims) and the conquerer of the west. The history stems from when Yusuf ibn Tashfin led the Muslim forces in the Battle of Zallaqa/Sagrajas. He came to Andalusia from Morocco to help the Muslims fight against Alfonso VI, eventually achieving victory and allowing the Muslims to remain in Spain for centuries. The battle has been symbolic for Muslim victory against the Christians.
(Note: the link was posted before the true(?) photo of “Tashfeen Malik” was presented to mainstream news agencies and Mr. Shoebat posts photos mistakenly identifying a relative of Syed Farook as Malik.)
To recap, a terrorist using a fake name and a fictitious address came into this country on a K-1 fiancé visa. And she was “vetted” by our government.
I'm a bit skeptical of the idea that the wife radicalized the husband, at least as the overall explanation. It just doesn't pass the smell test. Guy who grows up in America seeks a Saudi wife, and brings back a woman who covers her face most of the time, and he chose someone like this without being a bit radical to begin with?
My thoughts entirely. He was in the market for a partner. It was arranged and she was set up to pass muster.
The whole thing is just wrong.
I read something earlier and I can't find it now but they supposedly had around $35,000 in the bank.....
His job of $70 K per year was not what I would consider "high" pay for California. How does a new couple get that kind of scratch?
I read something earlier and I can't find it now but they supposedly had around $35,000 in the bank.....
His job of $70 K per year was not what I would consider "high" pay for California. How does a new couple get that kind of scratch?
He had his job for 5 years and lived simply. Not hard to accumulate that money as a single guy who doesn't bar hop and drug.
If there is more to it than that, I'm sure the FBI has folks working on it. But, it may just be that you can save money if you try hard.
You do realize that the cost of living there is something on the order of quadruple the cost of living here, don't you?
You do realize that the cost of living there is something on the order of quadruple the cost of living here, don't you?
It's higher but 4x higher? I'm not sure about that.
It's higher but 4x higher? I'm not sure about that.
My home would sell for 3 to 4 times as much there as I could get for it here with lass than half the property.
My home would sell for 3 to 4 times as much there as I could get for it here with lass than half the property.
I have a friend who married a woman who was from California, and that is what I have been given to understand.