I knew it was too good to be true (to be the first bearer of the news I mean). That's OK. All the glory to John Browning and the USMC!!
Mr. Browning would be proud!
I knew it was too good to be true (to be the first bearer of the news I mean). That's OK. All the glory to John Browning and the USMC!!
Mr. Browning would be proud!
The 1911 seems awful heavy and large. It would seem a reliable polymer in .45 would produce the same results, cost much, much less, and be more comfortable to carry.
It has only taken 25+ years for the military to realize their mistake replacing the 1911 with the Beretta 92's.
I knew it was too good to be true (to be the first bearer of the news I mean).
Your avatar was, though.
could have done the same thing with an glock 21, M&P 45, etc. cheaper and without driving armorers insane.
Doesn't this figure out to about 5k per firearm?
No; my math makes it about $1875 per pistol ($22,500,000.00 / 12,000), and the contract amount also includes spare parts, mags, and "logistical support".