What is this graph showing? How often people searched for the symptoms of those things? Is there a source to zoom into a tighter time window?View attachment 166912
Coincidence I’m sure.
From 2004-present, with a sudden increase 10x the amount of any point in the past 20 years. Not sure why just focusing on the last 2 years would be more telling than a 20 year window?What is this graph showing? How often people searched for the symptoms of those things? Is there a source to zoom into a tighter time window?
To see if this started when COVID started, or when the vaccines started. If this shows searches for symptoms, both of those things have been linked to heart problems.From 2004-present, with a sudden increase 10x the amount of any point in the past 20 years. Not sure why just focusing on the last 2 years would be more telling than a 20 year window?
Thanks. And this is showing how often people did a Google search for myocarditis or the symptoms?
From 2004-present, with a sudden increase 10x the amount of any point in the past 20 years. Not sure why just focusing on the last 2 years would be more telling than a 20 year window?
That’s just the term “myocarditis”Thanks. And this is showing how often people did a Google search for myocarditis or the symptoms?
A CNBC article reported the CDC actually admitted there is “likely a link” between getting two doses of the vaccine and myocarditis in young people. INGO tells me the MSM and the CDC both should immediately be discredited since they’re part of the big cover-up, so I don’t know what to make of it.That’s just the term “myocarditis”
Except one is a disease, which has been around throughout the entire timeline.
Sounds like msm is finally reporting what non msm sources are. Wonder what else is true about the vaccine that msm refuses to acknowledgeA CNBC article reported the CDC actually admitted there is “likely a link” between getting two doses of the vaccine and myocarditis in young people. INGO tells me the MSM and the CDC both should immediately be discredited since they’re part of the big cover-up, so I don’t know what to make of it.
When someone has already rolled over and been vaccinated, I think they will go to great lengths to convince themselves they made the correct choice - at least until they have a stroke at the age of 35I don't think you understand how the word analyst is used. You're picturing her in a white coat with a microscope and beakers developing drugs which isn't the case. For one 'biotech' is just a word for an industry and analyst can mean anything from crunching numbers and study data to looking at market trends. So even for sales and marketing you could be a 'biotech analyst'. I'm not sure what the point is for attacking her job role, it doesn't mean she doesn't have useful information, it could very well be nonsense but you'll have to do better than that. She owns a company that works with the pharmaceutical and medical device industry i'm not sure what this new hustle would do for her?
You mean like people like route automatically trying to discredit the woman rather than the data she presents?People will automatically try to discredit it “because Reuters” but will make no attempt to discredit the actual argument they make. I assume it’s because they can’t...
If the case is that he is suffering the ill effects of being injected with experimental synthetic messenger RNA, does anyone think we'll actually hear the truth about his condition? Seems unlikely.
Best source I've come across, posted today on Dr. Malone's Telegram account.I think we'd hear about it, or figure something out, if it's something obvious that couldn't be swept under the rug, like death or a serious health issue that he can't hide.
Best source I've come across, posted today on Dr. Malone's Telegram account.
View attachment 166964