Hearing set for March 6:
https://gunowners.org/alert22119/
PLEASE everyone, TAKE ACTION by filling out the contact form and sharing GOA's post on social media. GOA makes this Betty Crocker simple from their website.
Done. Quick and easy.
I read that a federal judge gave the go ahead to ban bump stocks on Monday. I still don't see how they can just outlaw them without compensating the people
that have legally owned them prior to the ban.
Translation for non-legal people?
That mean he's going out of his way to make sure they get banned?
Translation for non-legal people?
That mean he's going out of his way to make sure they get banned?
These items were purchased legally and the government is not offering restitution for the financial loss incurred by those who wish not to become felons overnight. This is highly unjust and needs judicial intervention. Please make your voice heard or they could be coming for your AR-15 next.
FPC ‘s statement:
https://www.firearmspolicy.org/joint_statement_on_federal_court_ruling_bumpstocks
INGO lawyers, what about GOA’s scheduled hearing on March 6?
Most of the plaintiffs’ administrative law challenges are foreclosed by theChevron doctrine, which permits an agency to reasonably define undefined statutory terms.
Should be fun when it gets to the SCOTUS.
The actual opinion is interesting, but I've only skimmed it for some high points. Not sure what the March 6 hearing is, but probably some administrative pre-trial conference to map out next steps. That might get vacated depending on the appeal status.
The judge addresses the takings issue by saying that there will be an opportunity at some later date for the plaintiffs to seek money from the government for their bumpstocks.
*coff*
(@Fargo)
As far as administrative law challenges, she would be correct. Criminal law is a different story, which is strangely unaddressed in my skim of the opinion.
The actual opinion is interesting, but I've only skimmed it for some high points. Not sure what the March 6 hearing is, but probably some administrative pre-trial conference to map out next steps. That might get vacated depending on the appeal status.
The judge addresses the takings issue by saying that there will be an opportunity at some later date for the plaintiffs to seek money from the government for their bumpstocks.
*coff*
(@Fargo)
As far as administrative law challenges, she would be correct. Criminal law is a different story, which is strangely unaddressed in my skim of the opinion.
Easier than chopping up a bump stock..... And far more effective for our freedoms.Hearing set for March 6:
https://gunowners.org/alert22119/
PLEASE everyone, TAKE ACTION by filling out the contact form and sharing GOA's post on social media. GOA makes this Betty Crocker simple from their website.