Leaked/breaking:Roe v. Wade expected to be overturned

[KG1]

Looks to me this is an extension from when "Schmucky" Schumer whipped the pro-abortion choice group into a frenzy gathered for a rally outside the Supreme Court when he threatened SCOTUS justices that they would "release the whirlwind and pay the price" if they ever messed with Roe v. Wade. Which was basically an attempt to intimidate also.

 

[Cameramonkey]

If justices didnt have security protection details already, Its probably time. Its not much of a stretch for one of these murder zealots to try to perform a super duper late term abortion on Alito or others for daring to take away their "rights".

 

[Shadow01]

Roberts will stop it for his legacy.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

 

[Chewie]

Where's a good rainstorm when you need one.

Sleet would be much better! Maybe even a little bit of hail!

 

[Doug]

Stand by for CNN to say this is the start of the repeal of the 19th. Amendment, denial of property rights for women, and denial of citizenship for women. This will be followed by women not being allowed to appear in public without an adult male relative being present.

 

[Tombs]

A grave sin of the nation is being undone, of course the wicked screech at the top of their lungs.

 

[HoughMade]

If justices didnt have security protection details already, Its probably time.

They do. It is provided by the U.S. Marshal Service, if requested.

 

[DoggyDaddy]

Schumer is already talking about introducing law to codify abortion rights. This is 100% about the November elections, make no mistake about it.

 

[Cameramonkey]

Stand by for CNN to say this is the start of the repeal of the 19th. Amendment, denial of property rights for women, and denial of citizenship for women. This will be followed by women not being allowed to appear in public without an adult male relative being present.

Oh yeah. Somebody just spouted that off on my next door app. Good grief. Surprised they haven’t also said that they’ll be bringing back slavery too.

 

[triggerhappy00]

Oh yeah. Somebody just spouted that off on my next door app. Good grief. Surprised they haven’t also said that they’ll be bringing back slavery too.

Give them time. This will for sure be racist too.

 

[courier6]

A grave sin of the nation is being undone, of course the wicked screech at the top of their lungs.

Abortion will still be 100% legal. This will just allow states to choose. They are screeching this much over state's choice.

 

[Cameramonkey]

Give them time. This will for sure be racist too.

If anyone is racist, its them. They are pushing for allowing black babies to be killed. Look at the stats. More black women get abortions than anyone else. And Im sure brown ladies do too. So I guess black lives only matter once they are out of the womb.

 

[DoggyDaddy]

So I guess black lives only matter once they are out of the womb.

They clearly don't matter even then. If they did, they'd stop focusing on "gun control" and start focusing on why the leading cause of death amongst young black males is being shot by another young black male.

 

[DragonGunner]

Abortion will still be 100% legal. This will just allow states to choose. They are screeching this much over state's choice.

Yup. Woman who want to murder their baby will just travel to a nearby state. Its stops nothing, prevents nothing. Until its outlawed nothing really changes. 62 million murdered. The Left will be using tax dollars to bus or fly future murderers to states to have it done. Such a inconvenience for these poor murderers.

 

[BigRed]

Abortion will still be 100% legal. This will just allow states to choose. They are screeching this much over state's choice.

State's rights, like Liberty, are very unpopular.

 

[jamil]

I think it may have been the ghost of RGB that may have leaked the opinion.

View attachment 198491

In all seriousness, my money would be on a clerk working for one of the liberal justices. And if I were to venture a casual guess, I'm guessing someone working for Sotomeyer.

 

[jake blue]

States rights: yup, I've already been called a Confederate for using the term states rights. As has already been stated, all this ruling will do is return the decision to states to decide. That's what liberals hate, the freedom for states to choose, so they trot out arguments about slavery and segregation as evidence of the ills of states rights.

As for Schumer wanting to codify abortion law, my opinion is that's what should have happened in the first place. I'm not for abortion but it was never the Court's prerogative to create laws. The same goes for same sex marriage. I support same sex marriage but in both of these matters it was the Legislative branch job to decide what America is for or against and write laws to that effect. Instead, the Legislative branch is too concerned about spending the Treasury and getting reelected so that they abdicated legislation to the Judicial branch who's job it is to INTERPRET laws and determine constitutionality, not invent new laws or new rights to fit the social discourse of the era. Yet that's where we've been for apparently at least 50 years. And now just like with executive orders, if one court can giveth rights then another court can taketh away. It's time we made our elected representatives in DC do their actual jobs instead of just wasting our money. Let the court decide if the law passes muster but not force the court to surrogate for the legislature.

 

[jamil]

Abortion will still be 100% legal. This will just allow states to choose. They are screeching this much over state's choice.

Several states have laws on the books that ban abortions as soon as the court strikes down R v W.

 

[jamil]

States rights: yup, I've already been called a Confederate for using the term states rights. As has already been stated, all this ruling will do is return the decision to states to decide. That's what liberals hate, the freedom for states to choose, so they trot out arguments about slavery and segregation as evidence of the ills of states rights.

As for Schumer wanting to codify abortion law, my opinion is that's what should have happened in the first place. I'm not for abortion but it was never the Court's prerogative to create laws. The same goes for same sex marriage. I support same sex marriage but in both of these matters it was the Legislative branch job to decide what America is for or against and write laws to that effect. Instead, the Legislative branch is too concerned about spending the Treasury and getting reelected so that they abdicated legislation to the Judicial branch who's job it is to INTERPRET laws and determine constitutionality, not invent new laws or new rights to fit the social discourse of the era. Yet that's where we've been for apparently at least 50 years. And now just like with executive orders, if one court can giveth rights then another court can taketh away. It's time we made our elected representatives in DC do their actual jobs instead of just wasting our money. Let the court decide if the law passes muster but not force the court to surrogate for the legislature.

Does the federal government possess the authority to prevent states from enacting laws to ban abortion? I'm not sure. But it's pretty certain in my reading that the courts made up a law out of thin air.