I agree. To me the determining factor argument in which a human right to life only begins at the point of viability outside the womb misses the mark.I think the people who make that argument mean that it can't survive outside the womb if it were removed from the mother. And I think that's a bad argument too. It assumes that the right to live can only be conferred if it's not dependent on the mother for life. I mean that's essentially the parasite argument. And I think that's immoral.
IMO human right to life begins much sooner once the reproductive process has begun at which time there is an individual human right separate from the mother to develop into viability without it being snatched away.
Last edited: