Sunday sales is in, cold beer in gas stations got shot down. I agree with your point, enough booze and pot discussion. Time for 2A!
Thanks for the correction, my wife relayed the message and im guessing she misunderstood
Sunday sales is in, cold beer in gas stations got shot down. I agree with your point, enough booze and pot discussion. Time for 2A!
Guy was more positive on 1424 since Reps Wesco and Smaltz are the authors (Committee Chair and Vice Chair.) The bills are very, very similar. I found the House schedule, remaining committee hearings for this session will be on 24 Jan, 14 and 21 Feb.I’ve been pessimistic about HB1022 even getting a hearing and Guy was too on tonight’s show...
I’m really getting sick of the same crap every Session.
I didnt read the entirety of both 1022 and 1424 but whats the difference between the two? I noticed that 1424 requires an id to be carried while carrying.
Keep in mind there are multiple bills with ConC and other bills addressing issues such as 5 year LTCH, carry at worship service when church is also a school, LTCH=no NICS check, no fee 4 year license etc. if things blur that's okay. Hopefully we'll keep matriculating the ball down the field and have a better picture soon.My understanding is one of these bills has a provision for a 5-year license instead of a 4-year and requires ISP to check Federal data bases? Further, that this gives us the ability to avoid NICS checks? My question is what is the impact on those of us who already have a lifetime LTCH? Will we also get the "benefit" of no NICS checks?
My understanding is that a lifetime license will never have the benefit of avoiding NICS checks. When the NICS check is done every 5 years for the license it meets the Federal rule.
My understanding is that a lifetime license will never have the benefit of avoiding NICS checks. When the NICS check is done every 5 years for the license it meets the Federal rule.
HOT OFF THE PRESS!! HB 1424 is scheduled for a committee hearing 24 January at 0830. Room 156 B
When I read the synopsis of 1424, it talks about a "resident" not being required to have a license to carry. Is it safe to assume this does not apply to non-residents...that non-residents would have to have a license or permit from their home state to carry in Indiana?
If so, does 1022 have that same requirement? And do other constitutional carry states allow non-residents to carry without a license?
When I read the synopsis of 1424, it talks about a "resident" not being required to have a license to carry. Is it safe to assume this does not apply to non-residents...that non-residents would have to have a license or permit from their home state to carry in Indiana?
If so, does 1022 have that same requirement? And do other constitutional carry states allow non-residents to carry without a license?
Good catch GFGT. I was looking for the differences since 1424 is a page longer, I knew there had to be differences. Let me review, more to follow.
HOT OFF THE PRESS!! HB 1424 is scheduled for a committee hearing 24 January at 0830. Room 156 B
Some. Here's a slightly oudated breakdown. https://www.concealedcarry.com/reciprocity/constitutional-carry-state-by-state/
Current Constitutional Carry Status:*Open Carry of handguns without a license is legal, Concealed Carry requires a permit.
What the future holds:*Open carry of handguns without a permit is allowed as long as the handgun is at least 2 actions from being fired, for example, if those actions were, 1) rack the slide to chamber, and 2) pull the trigger.
Open carry of a loaded handgun (e.g., a live round of ammunition in the firing chamber) is allowed with a permit.