Liberty Sanders
Master
Yes. Employers will be required to provide spousal benefits based on a relationship that they may find offensive.
Who gives a damn if an employer finds a relationship "offensive?" A spouse is a spouse.
Yes. Employers will be required to provide spousal benefits based on a relationship that they may find offensive.
That's kind of the point. It doesn't. Therefore it doesn't much matter if it disgusts you, the Constitution is about equal protection, not keeping you from being offended.Your question does not make sense. How would denying gays rights infringe on my rights?
Who gives a damn if an employer finds a relationship "offensive?" A spouse is a spouse.
So you are claiming it infringes on an employer's rights by forcing them to give equal benefits to their workers?Yes. Employers will be required to provide spousal benefits based on a relationship that they may find offensive.
The feds are one judge away from ensuring you are prohibited from carrying...well, not you...just private citizens.
Looking to the central goverment to address State matters is a treacherous proposition.
I love reading all the thinly disguised hatred for homosexuality posted by people who claim to be pro-freedom.
Well, if I own the company, the assets should be mine to distribute the way I see fit. Right?[/QUOTE
If you provide benefits to your employees, they're provided to ALL of them, not the ones whose marital arrangements suit your personal beliefs.
So shouldn't employers be more upset over the grave injustice that applies to 90% of their workforce instead of the last 10%?
Well, if I own the company, the assets should be mine to distribute the way I see fit. Right?[/QUOTE
If you provide benefits to your employees, they're provided to ALL of them, not the ones whose marital arrangements suit your personal beliefs.
Exactly. I lose my right to manage my assets as I see fit. Will I also be required to pay everyone the same wage?
Are you certain they aren't?
May I ask if you are a business owner responsible for employees and making payroll?
Well, if I own the company, the assets should be mine to distribute the way I see fit. Right?
Exactly. I lose my right to manage my assets as I see fit. Will I also be required to pay everyone the same wage?
No. The ones with the greatest need deserve the most. That was easy!
It makes him enlightened. Once upon a time slavery was accepted. Segregation. Woman's rights. All practices that were once enjoyed very little support until people stood up against injustice and said enough to ignorance and discrimination.
Yes. Employers will be required to provide spousal benefits based on a relationship that they may find offensive.
Exactly. I lose my right to manage my assets as I see fit. Will I also be required to pay everyone the same wage?
That's kind of the point. It doesn't. Therefore it doesn't much matter if it disgusts you, the Constitution is about equal protection, not keeping you from being offended.
Yes I am certain they aren't. If they were they would be putting their priorities on getting FMLA etc declared unconstitutional instead of whining about gay rights.
Slave owners said the same thing before the 13th Amendment, and business owners in the south said the same thing about the Civil Rights Act.
So you tell me what is the graver injustice, your inability to be a prick, or someone else's inability to have some basic ****ing dignity.
Your quote skills have failed you horribly. Are you related to Hotdoger?
Exactly. I lose my right to manage my assets as I see fit. Will I also be required to pay everyone the same wage?
If you are paying someone less because of sexual preference, or any other prejudice, you are setting yourself up for a business ending lawsuit. Good luck.
The Constitution is about equal protection, not keeping you from being offended.