I hear he gets applause everywhere he goes.... someone said he always has the Clap...
I hear he gets applause everywhere he goes.... someone said he always has the Clap...
Has there been anymore information put out on this?
I'd be happy if they released the probable cause affidavitWe are at the point in which the wheels of (in)justice turn slowly. Expect nothing for a bit.
I'd be happy if they released the probable cause affidavit
Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk
It should just be accessible on mycase. And not hidden in lawyers onlyThe redacted version of the probable cause affidavit is a public record. Contact the County Clerk's office for instructions on how to access public records under the state Access to Public Records Act (APRA). Be sure to ask the correct county for which case you want, as one officer is charged in Marion County and the other in Hamilton.
Practice tip: When requesting public records from state or local government agencies in Indiana, make the request under the APRA. FOIA is often cited, but it is a federal law and applies to information being held by federal agencies.
I'd be happy if they released the probable cause affidavit
Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk
It should just be accessible on mycase. And not hidden in lawyers only
Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk
Because transparency? Because the public has the right to know the details?Why? So he can first be tried in the court of public opinion, possibly corrupting the jury pool? Neither of the officers in the original story needs any more details released than already. They both deserve due process. (Painful to say looking at fatboy and his allegations, but this is America. *sigh*)
Because transparency? Because the public has the right to know the details?
Because IMPD and the MCPO are not the gestapo conducting secret arrests?
Because with the release of information may come a valid reason and or defense?
I'm very curious and find the phrase "as to this case only" to be both curious and troubling.
Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk
Why do you have such a hard on for him?
You don't like how it smells? Why because one of my biggest fears is oops bought a used gun and it turned out to be stolen? The only saving grace is that I haven't bought any Smith and Wessons in a couple years.I've been wondering this as well. I don't like the way this smells.
You don't like how it smells? Why because one of my biggest fears is oops bought a used gun and it turned out to be stolen? The only saving grace is that I haven't bought any Smith and Wessons in a couple years.
Or is it because I asked a question? I've never seen "this case only" on a single case. Usually it's on multiple cases or on cases that are consolidated. A reasonable assumption is that there is another case of something out there.
Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk
Because transparency? Because the public has the right to know the details?
Because IMPD and the MCPO are not the gestapo conducting secret arrests?
Because with the release of information may come a valid reason and or defense?
I'm very curious and find the phrase "as to this case only" to be both curious and troubling.
Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk
Methinks you are being tried in the court of public opinion now on this forum for daring to be too inquisitive about a prominent member.You don't like how it smells? Why because one of my biggest fears is oops bought a used gun and it turned out to be stolen? The only saving grace is that I haven't bought any Smith and Wessons in a couple years.
Or is it because I asked a question? I've never seen "this case only" on a single case. Usually it's on multiple cases or on cases that are consolidated. A reasonable assumption is that there is another case of something out there.
Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk
There aren't any other cases. That is something they put in MyCase. Why do you have such a hard on for him?
The "as to this case only" is a standard part of a release order in Marion County. There are several criminal courts in Marion County, and they get this specific with the orders as a "just in case" protection, so that it is clear that the order releasing the person from custody is only for this one case. It is a direction to the custody staff that this release order applies ONLY to this case, and not any other cases or holds that may be on the individual.
You are reading a lot more into this.
It took a lot of cream to ease the butt-hurt, but I survived it. The dog piles and neg rep was the stuff of legend.
First, let me specifically say I understand that it has nothing to do with this case.
I find it curious that a public portal is set up to differentiate between lawyers and non lawyers in what public information is made available.