As long as we dont have anymore dating threads lol
Tell me about it. Some people got the hammerMan that was a disaster.
LOLWas gone before that one. My track record for crazy women has been perfect without the aid of technology.
Tell me about it. Some people got the hammer
Was gone before that one. My track record for crazy women has been perfect without the aid of technology.
It certainly is speculative at this point. Have'nt heard the other side of the story. Maybe there's a plausible explanation that no one knows about yet. It appears that the Dept. doesn't feel there is one to their satisfaction so they decided to take action. Who knows.It’s misplaced for all we know. Speculation and all of that.
As long as we dont have anymore dating threads lol
Chuck E. Cheese.As long as we dont have anymore dating threads lol
It certainly is speculative at this point. Have'nt heard the other side of the story. Maybe there's a plausible explanation that no one knows about yet. It appears that the Dept. doesn't feel there is one to their satisfaction so they decided to take action. Who knows.
I read those details in the Star a few days ago but didn’t want to link to them due to the sensitive nature of the situation. That article is the reason I was trying to find the probable cause affidavits. They’re public records, but as of now, only the media seems to be relating the details, which means we get information through their filters. I’d rather read them directly.
This is certainly a reasonable position given the fact that you and other members know the individual personally. Even though I do not I have no reason to doubt his character given everything I have come to know about him over the course of many years as a member here.This.
I don't know the situation, but I do know the man. Things don't add up. There is DEFINITELY more to the story.
Look, there are multiple ways a car ends up in the possession of an auto auction. The big auction houses also act as holding and storage lots for repos, bank-owned, and lease turn-in vehicles, in addition to having an inventory of cars owned by the auction itself.
I see a LOT Of used cars from the auction, and I have (personally) found drugs, sex toys, weapons, medical devices...you name it, and that's after the car has been through AT LEAST one auction house.
When "normal" property is left in a car, that property belongs to the buyer of that car. I'm not sure if there are additional or different rules for firearms, but, in general, it's finders keepers with leftover property.
In other words...it may be fully up to the auction how they wish to deal with found property in cars that *they* own. Destroy it, trash it, sell it...turn it over to the cops...whatever. I see nothing untoward about contracting privately to remove those unwanted, legally possessed, items from that ALSo legally-possessed property.
So, hypothetically...lets say I make a good-faith deal with the management of an auction house to take possession of, and responsibility for, the found property that the auction does not want. Now let's say, due to an honest mixup or some confusion, the auction house hands over a gun found in a repo, bank-owned, lease turn-in or other car that *is not* actually owned by the auction...at that point the auction is handing over property that *doesn't actually belong to them*.
In this scenario the property will not likely be reported stolen, and I would have no reasonable way of knowing the property doesn't actually belong to the auction house to give away...until it's too late.
Im holding out judgement until the full details emerge. There is too great a chance, in my opinion, of a confluence of mistakes, political underpinnings, or simple misunderstanding to grab my pitchfork.
Im willing to assume, unless further information presents items, that a really good man got caught up in a really crappy situation.
This.
I don't know the situation, but I do know the man. Things don't add up. There is DEFINITELY more to the story.
Look, there are multiple ways a car ends up in the possession of an auto auction. The big auction houses also act as holding and storage lots for repos, bank-owned, and lease turn-in vehicles, in addition to having an inventory of cars owned by the auction itself.
I see a LOT Of used cars from the auction, and I have (personally) found drugs, sex toys, weapons, medical devices...you name it, and that's after the car has been through AT LEAST one auction house.
When "normal" property is left in a car, that property belongs to the buyer of that car. I'm not sure if there are additional or different rules for firearms, but, in general, it's finders keepers with leftover property.
In other words...it may be fully up to the auction how they wish to deal with found property in cars that *they* own. Destroy it, trash it, sell it...turn it over to the cops...whatever. I see nothing untoward about contracting privately to remove those unwanted, legally possessed, items from that ALSo legally-possessed property.
So, hypothetically...lets say I make a good-faith deal with the management of an auction house to take possession of, and responsibility for, the found property that the auction does not want. Now let's say, due to an honest mixup or some confusion, the auction house hands over a gun found in a repo, bank-owned, lease turn-in or other car that *is not* actually owned by the auction...at that point the auction is handing over property that *doesn't actually belong to them*.
In this scenario the property will not likely be reported stolen, and I would have no reasonable way of knowing the property doesn't actually belong to the auction house to give away...until it's too late.
Im holding out judgement until the full details emerge. There is too great a chance, in my opinion, of a confluence of mistakes, political underpinnings, or simple misunderstanding to grab my pitchfork.
Im willing to assume, unless further information presents items, that a really good man got caught up in a really crappy situation.
The problem is Indiana isn't a finders keepers state.
That's why we have indianaunclaimed.gov
The Crux of the issue will be IC 34-4-4
Especially as a police officer. You can't just keep a gun because you found it.
Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk
The problem is Indiana isn't a finders keepers state.
That's why we have indianaunclaimed.gov
The Crux of the issue will be IC 34-4-4
Especially as a police officer. You can't just keep a gun because you found it.
Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk