I am wondering if he is calling some mechanism "frozen" that I would not consider "frozen". Actually freezing an account- barring all account access and activity due to a court order is highly unusual even with more serious financial crimes. It cannot be done without a court order (I guess someone could agree to it).I’m still looking for an article that provides a ”legal” source for freezing an account.
Something doesn't make sense.
If this was Indiana, I would have already looked at any orders in the case. I don't have that kind of access for California.
Something just doesn't make sense about this. I am not accusing Mr. Racop of untruthfulness, far from, but this doesn't add up.