EliteCageFighting
Plinker
This was posted on my political forum. I thought I would see how you would respond before I screw it up, LOL.
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica]I really fail to see how this is all that useful. If he is going to take away the right to own a gun it is not really going to matter if you happen to own one now or not.
Obama sponsored a "one handgun a month" law. To be honest I cannot think of a single reason a person would need to buy more than one handgun a month. I think that anything more than a month maybe 2 months would probably be unreasonable but anything inside of a month or 2 is fine with me. Certainly a person can wait 2 months to obtain as many handguns as they can reasonably fire at one time(2 hands...2 guns...makes sense to me). Stock up on clips and ammo if you want to feel more protected. I would even come close to supporting a one firearm a month law. I do not see any more reason someone all of a sudden would need a shotgun, a handgun and a rifle(or any combination of those in different numbers). I would imagine the need to replace guns lost in a natural disaster would be a reasonable exception up to a certain limit.
I am sure he has views that are more restrictive than the one I mentioned but I highly doubt they would be enacted into any type of law. Considering the Supreme Court's ruling on the DC gun ban things should be a bit more clear and frankly I do not see how this is even an issue anymore. He and the government have far more pressing issues to tackle than gun control and for that matter we have far more important issues to press the government to fix. It will not matter how many ways we can purchase a firearm or carry one we happen to have if we are standing in a soup line.
[/FONT]