AndreusMaximus
Master
So you would not accept a bill that abolishes a relatively onerous infringements on our rights while imposing a relatively insignificant one?Why should we be giving away any part of our rights even if we get something in return for doing so? Those rights I will not compromise whatever they offer in return for them.
Do you actually think by compromising our rights they would concede anything to us that moves the needle back in our direction towards abolishing ALL of their infringements?
Compromising our rights by the very nature means that we are infringing on our own rights to try and get them to stop infringing. That's just plain ludicrous IMO.
I will not bargain away any part of my rights.