In your rush to battle every post in sight you're not making any sense. The WH can certainly influence what the CDC prioritizes just as we saw with obama. With obama however the results were not what they wanted hence they buried it, so the WH was very much trying to drive the narrative, remember fast and furious, another failed attempt to drive the narrative? The CDC is anti-gun, the biden administration is anti-gun there's no reason to believe the CDC will put guns aside. The CDC is a driver and funder of research they want to support, they don't conduct a lot of their own research per se but they decide what does get funded. Since the 90's beat down and with the Dickey Amendment they've behaved pretty well but opened up 10M in funding this year alone. Here's what a past head of the injury control division had to say: [FONT=&]Dr. Mark Rosenberg was quoted in the [/FONT]Washington Post[FONT=&] as wanting his agency to create a public perception of firearms as “dirty, deadly—and banned.”
[/FONT]Think about that for awhile.
It's in the works...
https://www.google.com/search?ei=rb...hUKEwiPqriJtPbsAhUYWs0KHSATDUoQ4dUDCA0&uact=5