Wait a minute.....are you telling there's a ditch somewhere that grows moonshine and all you gotta do is scoop it up and sell it? If so I want the coordinates please!!!Not much different from selling moonshine
Wait a minute.....are you telling there's a ditch somewhere that grows moonshine and all you gotta do is scoop it up and sell it? If so I want the coordinates please!!!Not much different from selling moonshine
In my state, and others, a worker's comp claim will be denied if the injured employee tests positive for drugs or alcohol (and such testing is required to preserve your benefit)Is the screening dictated by insurance companies citing the feds as the reason?
Non sequitur. We are talking about growing pot on your property and processing it for illegal sale (there is more involved in making it a salable product than just cutting a plant with a machete and handing it to a customer, but you know that)Wait a minute.....are you telling there's a ditch somewhere that grows moonshine and all you gotta do is scoop it up and sell it? If so I want the coordinates please!!!
There's a show on Discovery (I think), called "Moonshiners" that shows these guys making illegal moonshine out in the woods. I've always wondered how they can get away with filming someone doing that yet no charges are ever filed.Not much different from selling moonshine
Then campaign for a higher specificity test to be developed, or better yet don't risk your livelihood just to get highImagine the uproar if there was a test that showed somebody drank alcohol a month ago, and were being fired as drunk on the job or being held responsible for an accident that occurred today?
People would be losing their minds!
YET they do the same thing with regard to marijuana without a second thought.
Dumb...
And that's as it should be IMHO. Again, it should be treated basically like alcohol when it comes to being under the influence while at work or while driving.But make no mistake, such tests WILL be developed and used. Being allowed to possess MJ does not mean its use will be tolerated either behind the wheel or in many fields of endeavor
If I video you speeding and weaving in and out of traffic with my dash cam and show that footage to a police officer, do you think he will write you a ticket?There's a show on Discovery (I think), called "Moonshiners" that shows these guys making illegal moonshine out in the woods. I've always wondered how they can get away with filming someone doing that yet no charges are ever filed.
I'm sure IngoMike will be happy to relay your complaint to the HOA for actionWe should outlaw dandelions. It only takes one. As soon as it moves in, the neighborhood is downhill. Oh, they claim, "it's for my salads, man!" But we all know better.
So, how many is too many if it isn't 'all' - 10%, 15%?The point of view that all MJ smokers are unreliable addicts and present a danger to the community at large fails to address that MJ is illegal now. And with it's illegality comes the same unreliable addicts and their associated danger to the community. Prohibition does not work. It has not, will not eliminate usage.
But this is a regular show. Seems like it would be really easy to follow a TV film crew out to the site where they're making it.If I video you speeding and weaving in and out of traffic with my dash cam and show that footage to a police officer, do you think he will write you a ticket?
For many crimes an officer has to witness the illegal behavior in order to prosecute. A felon displaying a gun on face tube might get his parole revoked but otherwise no one will charge him with possessing a firearm under disability unless they catch him with it on his person
What do you suppose the percentage of alcohol users that get behind the wheel and drive after 3 or 4 drinks at a bar is? I'm guessing it would be higher than 10 or 15%. Not talking about falling down drunk, but "legally" intoxicated.I'm sure IngoMike will be happy to relay your complaint to the HOA for action
So, how many is too many if it isn't 'all' - 10%, 15%?
Is that under the influence of drugs or alcohol or just having metabolites?In my state, and others, a worker's comp claim will be denied if the injured employee tests positive for drugs or alcohol (and such testing is required to preserve your benefit)
So that is essentially an insurer dictating the screening themselves not at federal behest
If legalized this will change, likely slowly, but will change…I believe it is still true that any job that requires a clearance cannot hire someone who smokes pot (unless they are a senator's or vice president's son, probably) or abuses any other drugs. It used to be that an OMVI might cost you your clearance because it raised doubts about your trustworthiness and self-control
Is that tolerated by law enforcement and the community?What do you suppose the percentage of alcohol users that get behind the wheel and drive after 3 or 4 drinks at a bar is? I'm guessing it would be higher than 10 or 15%. Not talking about falling down drunk, but "legally" intoxicated.
Obviously it is tolerated. I have a neighborhood bar near me where the parking lot is packed all day. I never ever see a cop sitting by there waiting to pull over patrons that are leaving. Why not? Because it's tolerated.Is that tolerated by law enforcement and the community?
And BTW, 2 drinks in an hour can put a 180 lb man close to if not over 0.08
Detectable MJ or other drugs of abuse and/or 0.02 or higher alcohol, analogous to a DOT test panelIs that under the influence of drugs or alcohol or just having metabolites?
Can they just pull them over? Don't they need to observe impaired driving or have other RAS? So would sitting outside the bar even be justifiable in court?Obviously it is tolerated. I have a neighborhood bar near me where the parking lot is packed all day. I never ever see a cop sitting by there waiting to pull over patrons that are leaving. Why not? Because it's tolerated.
First, sorry about your loved one. I cant imagine.weed and alcohol
Random road blocks are still legal, so why not put them where the drinkers are? I'm kind of playing devil's advocate here because I don't think they should do that, but I'm just pointing out that alcohol impairment is somehow more socially acceptable than MJ impairment.Can they just pull them over? Don't they need to observe impaired driving or have other RAS?
Bingo.I'd say more physical damage was done by the alcohol than the pot.