Yeah, no it doesn't. His post is clear, the simple "introduction" of ideas he disagrees with should be capital offenses. The Constitution has always found such views abhorrent.
Nonsense.
Article III explicitly lays out the Constitutional case for the punishment of treason.
Elected representatives swear "that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion."
Attempting to further principles contrary to the dictates and structure of the Constitution without utilizing the proscribed method to adapt said dictates and structure is assuredly criminal and potentially treasonous if that act brings harm to our nation--particularly if it benefits foreign entities. Globalism and socialism/communism are inimical to the framework of this country.