i was also thinking about getting a 10-22 and putting on the mg-42 dressup kit, make it full auto, get a couple 50 rd drum magzines and a bipod, but if priced it out and thats rediculous for how much all that stuff costs, so i think for now ill go with the hi-point. and why are we arguing glocks, we are talkin hi-points, glocks are junk.
i gotta ask..
what are you TALKING about? i hope this post is a joke......
make it full auto,
Keep us posted on this!
im just a fan of the mg-42 and this will probly be the closest to having one i will get. i think its cool, i know its all plastic, but if i was to buy a 10-22 thats what id do with it.
ya if i get back to work and get some more money, ill definately get it done and put up some pics. i doubt ill make it full auto, it would just be neat though, id hate to get in trouble over a .22
Calling a Glock "junk" only shows ignorance. Armed professionals carry Glocks and trust their lives to them on a daily basis. The same can be said for Sig, Smith & Wesson, Springfield, HK, etc. The same CANNOT be said for Hi-Point. No one I know (or have even heard of) that carries a gun for a living chooses a Hi-Point. There is a reason for that. (SNIP)
i was also thinking about getting a 10-22 and putting on the mg-42 dressup kit, make it full auto, get a couple 50 rd drum magzines and a bipod, but if priced it out and thats rediculous for how much all that stuff costs, so i think for now ill go with the hi-point. and why are we arguing glocks, we are talkin hi-points, glocks are junk.
Sometimes I feel this forum is becoming more like Glock Talk or AR15.
I suggest you just get it, and shoot it. Its only $150. What is there to talk about.