Not you, Obama's proposed EO. No one knows what it is so everyone be cool until we find out.
Linda Carter
I think we should be talking about how critically important it is to manipulate the government to force all of us to endorse everyone else's definition of "marriage." That's far, far more important than our inherent human right to self-defense and by extension the individual right to keep and bear arms.
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to DoggyDaddy again.
I sent an E-mail to Coats,Donnely,and Brooks--------"No more Anti-Gun Laws"
And,I sent a donation to the NRA-ILA
I'm doing something,instead of "guessing about what MIGHT happen"
Bobby Jo and the Outlaw.......look it up.....
Is it just me, or have we had a shift in entertainment so far as the hot females from back when were usually 30ish contrasted with most today at least trying their best to look about 13?
Obama blasts Congress, vows to move ahead on guns - POLITICO
Obama's going to dare the GOP to impeach him So badly in his last year as president, that he Might get them to whisper the word once. Might.
[video=youtube;YgAncNGh-Hs]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgAncNGh-Hs[/video]
Donate a NRA membership to Micheal Bloomberg?
Those were real women back then.Is it just me, or have we had a shift in entertainment so far as the hot females from back when were usually 30ish contrasted with most today at least trying their best to look about 13?
Spoken like a true submariner.Oh my.
I'll be in my bunk.
4. When all this is done, there is the option of literally going door to door, which stands to be extremely time consuming and potentially dangerous depending on when and where. Significantly, this option offers the only systematic device for sweeping up guns and owners with little or no paper trail so it would eventually have to happen unless, of course, they just decide to skip it and wait for attrition to set in via snitches and friends and relatives with diarrhea of the mouth.
The bonus question is what to expect of local law enforcement. On one hand, I would like to think of them as being part of 'us' rather than part of 'them'. On the other, given the enthusiasm I have witnesses to intensely attack politically incorrect substances, drunk driving, and non-use of seatbelts, all while declaring that my concerns are irrelevant because it is being paid with federal funds, I have a difficult time believing that they would eschew adding one more thing to their whoring for federal money list. The significant consequence is that this would expand the manpower pool exponentially. Also of concern is that if we have drifted this far into flagrant violation of the Constitution, I fail to see why the military or something like Obama's equal to the military but answers to him personally rather than the office of the President under proper congressional authorization force wouldn't be used.