Sounds about like what politicians would do.
Seems like what a substantial portion of INGOers would do. Oh no, what will the anti-gunners do? Better throw a felony on this guy.
Is that just for guns? Or if you take your eyes off the road and rear end a car with children in it should you eat a felony?
Seems like what a substantial portion of INGOers would do. Oh no, what will the anti-gunners do? Better throw a felony on this guy.
Let the court sort it out. What I think he deserves doesnt matter. He is guaranteed due process.Sometimes we can be tougher on our own "family" than others. The punishment ought to fit the "crime" but I'm not of the opinion this guy ought to have his life ruined over this with the information I have right now.
Seems like what a substantial portion of INGOers would do. Oh no, what will the anti-gunners do? Better throw a felony on this guy.
Shaking my headIt kinda brings a tear to my eye, when I think back on how far INGO has come since a certain "warning shot."
Pretty much what I was thinking. Crim reck Is one of the harder charges to prove, especially when you are alleging a unknowing act.Seems like what a substantial portion of INGOers would do. Oh no, what will the anti-gunners do? Better throw a felony on this guy.
Pocket carrying without a holster, yep I doPretty much what I was thinking. Crim reck Is one of the harder charges to prove, especially when you are alleging a unknowing act.
Unless, of course, we just think that everyone that pocket carry’s is committing crim reck...
like what I just said? Yep I think that's a smart thingHow about this:
Most of us are opposed to mandatory firearms training as a prerequisite of exercising our right to keep and bear arms.
What about when someone does something stupid or careless that was bad enough that someone could be hurt or was hurt? In those cases, would be consider mandatory firearms safety training and a passing score on a written and practical test for the responsible party?
Pocket carrying without a holster, yep I do
Realisticly I dont think the man should become a felon for this, because no one was injured. But I think if the court made him take mandatory gun safety classes it would be great.
If he didnt break an actual law, then dont waste the peoples time and money. But that still doesnt mean we can't be pissed at him
How about this:
Most of us are opposed to mandatory firearms training as a prerequisite of exercising our right to keep and bear arms.
What about when someone does something stupid or careless that was bad enough that someone could be hurt or was hurt? In those cases, would be consider mandatory firearms safety training and a passing score on a written and practical test for the responsible party?
We have something a bit similar over here when it comes to driving.
When you're caught speeding, using your phone while driving (illegal here) or running a red light, commit a DUI etc; you can lose points on your driving licence.
You have 12 points on it, once you lose all 12 you lose your driver's licence.
To get some of you points back you can take a class where they lecture you about driving safety.
I think there are similar programs in some US states, but even more extreme, where you're sent to a mandatory visit of the local morgue and ER to see what happens to victims of car accidents.
A LTCH with a point system would be an interesting concept.
Not sure how many points you would lose for a ND in a public place or for leaving your gun in a public restroom.
Of course I don't think that anyone should need a licence from the government to have the right to carry a gun and defend themselves to begin with.
How about this:
Most of us are opposed to mandatory firearms training as a prerequisite of exercising our right to keep and bear arms.
What about when someone does something stupid or careless that was bad enough that someone could be hurt or was hurt? In those cases, would be consider mandatory firearms safety training and a passing score on a written and practical test for the responsible party?
Hold up.
This was less of a "negligent discharge" and more of a "negligent dispossession."
You can only follow the 4 rules if you have the ACTUAL gun in your possession.
Not everyone has a negligent discharge. It's not really a common thing or shouldnt be.Surely we can all agree that ANYONE WHO HAS EXPERIENCED A NEGLIGENT DISCHARGE SHOULD LOSE THEIR RIGHTS OF GUN OWNERSHIP.
Sorry to yell.
But it seems as though some have a short memory.