Repeat after me please: "Trans people are not child molesters."
Do you have children?
Repeat after me please: "Trans people are not child molesters."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/c...p&cvid=3dd52201f442457fac2c5655fe38ab33&ei=14California is poised to take children away from parents who won't help them get sex changes
I'm sure @XMil would approve. You know what? **** it. Let's let infants determine their sexuality, smoke, drink, buy guns and vote. I mean, why not, right? They're obviously mature enough from birth. Parents are just infringing on their rights!iT'S noT AbOUt chILdRen!!!!!!!!!!
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/c...p&cvid=3dd52201f442457fac2c5655fe38ab33&ei=14
That really didn’t happen at the White House… Come on.
I was replying in disbelief that this happened at all with the President.Does not impact the truth of my statement though.
No? Best deepfake video I’ve ever seen, then.That really didn’t happen at the White House… Come on.
No? Best deepfake video I’ve ever seen, then.
I feel sorry for you. You have been radicalized and you are falling hook, line and sinker for the latest propaganda coming out of the extremist right. This is the same tired BS they came with in the 70's and 80's to demonize "the gays" to keep you scared and voting. Literally the exact same crap: they are coming for your children, destroying the American family, etc. Look it up.You should probably read the whole thing. The government didn't co-operate with the inquiry what data they did get comes from FOI requests. That data shows that of the cases they could identify as being trans-identifying, about half were in prison for sexual offenses. Overwhelmingly those individuals were born male and the pattern of their criminality does not align with female patterns of criminality. So, a sample of convicted sex offenders shows that about half of them are trans and though most of those are males claiming to be female, the crimes they commit are patterned like males and not females - two lies with one stone
The information in the article was submitted to and accepted by the UK parliament
Do you assert that where the MoJ did record information sufficient to determine biological sex vs claimed sex, that the data was recorded in such a way as to inflate or depress the number of trans sex offenders. The derived number was approximately half , are you saying 40% would be better or maybe 33%? Are you seriously claiming the number might be zero? Because that is what you would need to claim in order to support the assertion that trans people are not child molesters
I owe you one though, most people won't just stand up and admit they have zero desire to seek the truth and are just jumping on the "who are we supposed to hate today" bandwagon. Thanks for that!
Not jumping on a hate anybody bandwagon, if anything I might be climbing aboard the 'militant anti-Christians always seem to turn out to be gay' bandwagon with one foot still aboard the ''The lady doth protest too much, methinks" bandwagon
Oh, and please cite ANY source that backs up your claim that trans individuals are not child molesters
I'll wait
I don't know whether to feel sorry for you or laugh at you. This level of delusion and obliviousness is truly spectacular to observe. That someone can be so obtuse or blind as to claim in one sentence that we should allow children to decide if they want to be boys or girls and then conduct grotesque medical experiments on them if the choice is different than their gender, then in the very next accuse anyone who claims that we shouldn't be sexually experimenting with and mutilating children of being a radicalized extremist is so remarkable that I find it truly difficult to believe. But here you are. Josef Mengele would be proud.I feel sorry for you. You have been radicalized and you are falling hook, line and sinker for the latest propaganda coming out of the extremist right. This is the same tired BS they came with in the 70's and 80's to demonize "the gays" to keep you scared and voting. Literally the exact same crap: they are coming for your children, destroying the American family, etc. Look it up.
Second, if you are making decisions based obscure articles written by people who already "know" the answer and are just presenting random data to make it seem like they actually are basing their bias on evidence, you are probably beyond reaching.
You are telling me you don't understand science (which is kind of obvious from your general outlook) but just to help get you up to speed, here is an article from Cambridge U about why you can't prove a negative (which you asked me to do).
You, sir, are the one who claimed trans people are not child molesters (#2155 in this thread, in case it slipped your memory)I feel sorry for you. You have been radicalized and you are falling hook, line and sinker for the latest propaganda coming out of the extremist right. This is the same tired BS they came with in the 70's and 80's to demonize "the gays" to keep you scared and voting. Literally the exact same crap: they are coming for your children, destroying the American family, etc. Look it up.
Second, if you are making decisions based obscure articles written by people who already "know" the answer and are just presenting random data to make it seem like they actually are basing their bias on evidence, you are probably beyond reaching.
You are telling me you don't understand science (which is kind of obvious from your general outlook) but just to help get you up to speed, here is an article from Cambridge U about why you can't prove a negative (which you asked me to do).
Trans inmate who filmed sexual abuse of 7-year-old daughter housed in troubled NJ women’s prison