Wow, someone's been eating sour grapes.
I'm not a fan of the cut-out at the bottom of the grip (solution in search of a problem?) I
Didn't a lot of people find fault with the gen 4 Glocks when they debuted as well?
Didn't a lot of people find fault with the gen 4 Glocks when they debuted as well?
Didn't a lot of people find fault with the gen 4 Glocks when they debuted as well?
I find it interesting that they are many on Youtube that are complaining that Glock needs to make something "Fresh and New". The Gen 5 did not go far enough. But many of those very same people are also griping about how the Gen 5 is not completely backwards compatible and you can't just drop in older generation parts now.
How can you get something that is "Fresh and New" while at the same time being backwards compatible with all the older generations. That is talking out of both sides of your mouth and is dishonest.
And I have yet to see anyone explain what "Fresh and New" means. Chassis system? That would not be good enough, that would be copying Sig. Making parts thicker, heavier, more durable...or...making a better trigger? That would not be good enough, that would be copying CZ.
It seems that those people are more interested in creating a click bait video and not an honest review.
No matter what Glock does, people will gripe about it. People gripe about the Glock fanboys, but the anti Glock crowd is equally as bad. It get's old real fast.
Didn't a lot of people find fault with the gen 4 Glocks when they debuted as well?