...As far as the G30 having a greater payload, if you need more then 9 shots from your 45 you have a bigger problem to deal with.
Riiiiight, 9 rounds of the almighty 45 is enough for any situation.
Except when it isn't.
Hmm. Let's see. The latest example posted on INGO:
https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo...se/234229-14_45acp_slugs_and_still_going.html
Comparing handguns of equal height, the G30 can carry 13+1 to the P220s 9+1 (i.e. 40% more).
Greater capacity is an objective advantage of one design over the other. "But you'll never need it," is just wishful thinking. If it fits, why not to carry more in a smaller, lighter weight package?
What kind of Sig 220 you looking to get? There are 3 different kinds:Full(4.4" 8+1), Carry(3.9" 8+1), or Compact(3.9" 6+1). As far as the G30 having a greater payload, if you need more then 9 shots from your 45 you have a bigger problem to deal with.
The same fallacious statement could be made about a revolver. Of course, if you happen to NEED more available shots than that 9 rounder (say, if you have 10 opponents) . . .
What kind of Sig 220 you looking to get? There are 3 different kinds:Full(4.4" 8+1), Carry(3.9" 8+1), or Compact(3.9" 6+1). As far as the G30 having a greater payload, if you need more then 9 shots from your 45 you have a bigger problem to deal with.
If you were considering a metal framed Sig I would vote for that buuuttttt, all the polymer framed Sig's I have played with have had crappy triggers. Sooooo I gotta go with Glock.
My Sig 229 SAS is way better than my Glock.
The same fallacious statement could be made about a revolver. Of course, if you happen to NEED more available shots than that 9 rounder (say, if you have 10 opponents) . . .