Far as I'm concerned the 2A protects the right of private citizens to own fusion powered starships with VLS cells full of nuclear missiles, if they are so capable of building one.Now, hear me out, what do you say about private citizens owning hydrogen bombs or ICBMs?
When I argue with people about 2A and they ask me this, I honestly don't know how to reply. I feel like saying sure, because the equivalent arms 300 years ago were private citizens owning a fleet of their own personal warships with the ability to muster a militia at any time.
And it wouldn't be like every other person could afford a nuke. It would just be a very small amount of people, like in the past with owning a fleet of warships.
But I dunno if I'd want Jeff Bezos to be able to buy nukes?
But shall not be infringed kind of means its absolute...