Jan 24, 2013 #41 Z Zombieman34 Plinker Rating - 0% 0 0 0 Jan 13, 2011 110 16 Wells, Co Voted NO still at 96%
Jan 24, 2013 #42 nucular Expert Site Supporter Rating - 100% 10 0 0 Dec 17, 2012 1,325 113 Brownsburg I chose 'no' only because there was not an 'oh hell no' (in my best will smith voice?) option.
Jan 24, 2013 #43 TTravis Master Rating - 100% 1 0 0 Sep 13, 2011 1,591 38 Plainfield / Mooresville Thanks for the post. I voted NO.
Jan 24, 2013 #44 jeepjester Plinker Rating - 100% 2 0 0 Aug 17, 2012 75 6 done.voted no as everyone should.
Jan 24, 2013 #45 Mark 1911 Grandmaster Site Supporter Rating - 100% 12 0 0 Jun 6, 2012 10,941 83 Schererville, IN Done.
Jan 24, 2013 #46 richieray Plinker Rating - 0% 0 0 0 Jan 24, 2013 64 6 Kewanna Gun control should only be discussed as it relates to hitting your target
Jan 24, 2013 #47 stephen87 Grandmaster Rating - 100% 22 0 0 May 26, 2010 6,660 63 The Seven Seas SSGSAD said: VOTED 96% NO ..... Click to expand... So why'd you vote 4% yes?
Jan 25, 2013 #48 Steve B Expert Rating - 100% 17 0 0 Aug 18, 2011 817 18 KEWANNA 2ndAmendmentdefender said: I agree, but you open up a Constitutional Convention for amending the 2nd it opens up all of the Constitution. We might just lose a lot more than the 2nd Amendment. "Shall not be infringed" does not need clarification or solidifying! Click to expand... It does however need enforcing. Repeal the NFA laws and Hughes Amendment.
2ndAmendmentdefender said: I agree, but you open up a Constitutional Convention for amending the 2nd it opens up all of the Constitution. We might just lose a lot more than the 2nd Amendment. "Shall not be infringed" does not need clarification or solidifying! Click to expand... It does however need enforcing. Repeal the NFA laws and Hughes Amendment.