kickbacked
Master
- Jan 12, 2010
- 2,393
- 113
Theres quite a bit of debate between wanting a justice system thats from the 13th century all the way to wanting a justice system that plays to the hand of the accused. They are wildly different but i think it ultimately comes down to wanting whichever will give ingo the result they believe to be correct.Anarchy it seems to me. I can’t wrap my head around these “jury of your peers,” beliefs. Can some give me a hypothetical ? Let’s say a less affluent Black guy from the Southside of Chicago is accused of beating a White businessman he got into a fight with. What peers sit on his jury?