I need to look up who voted for approval on the ATF Director who knows nothing about guns, but was a more acceptable option than Gary Busey on meth.NRA-ILA | NRA Files Supreme Court Amicus Brief in Challenge to ATF’s “Frame or Receiver” Rule
On August 20, NRA filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Supreme Court in a challenge to the ATF’s Final Rule that redefines the Gun Control Act of 1968’s definition of “firearm” to include precursors of frames or receivers and weapon parts kits.www.nraila.org
What is NOT a more acceptable option than Gary Busey on meth?I need to look up who voted for approval on the ATF Director who knows nothing about guns, but was a more acceptable option than Gary Busey on meth.
and Uncle Joe. And Drunk Pelosi. And whiny aoc.What is NOT a more acceptable option than Gary Busey on meth?
Wait, Kamala Harris for one...
"Candor Toward the Tribunal" in Indiana is Rule 3.3 of the Indiana Rules of Professional Conduct, part of the Indiana Court Rules under Indiana Statutes and Codes. Every legal jurisdiction I've ever dealt with or brushed up against, including the military, has a "Rule 3.3". It's pretty much boiler plate.In a perfect world where the rules/laws were followed (aka not the reality we live in) what is the punishment for making these false statements in writing and giving them to the court as facts?