It should be illegal to steal a gun from your mom and kill her with it.
He stated in the first paragraph that he was in effect taking action to stop the cultural and ethnic replacement instigated by the Hispanic invasion.If you define racism in the traditional sense, yes. His most workable solution was to separate everyone by race/identity to live in different regions. That’s definitely identitarian. But that’s not racism in itself.
He didn’t kill the people at the Walmart because of their race. He killed them because they’re immigrants. He even said it would probably be more effective to kill (presumably) the people he calls traitors, Democrats and corporatist Republicans. But he said he couldn’t bring himself to kill Americans.
Certainly xenophobic. Not really all that evident of racism. And most definitely an indoctrinated murderous nut.
If you define racism in the traditional sense, yes. His most workable solution was to separate everyone by race/identity to live in different regions. That’s definitely identitarian. But that’s not racism in itself.
He didn’t kill the people at the Walmart because of their race. He killed them because they’re immigrants. He even said it would probably be more effective to kill (presumably) the people he calls traitors, Democrats and corporatist Republicans. But he said he couldn’t bring himself to kill Americans.
Certainly xenophobic. Not really all that evident of racism. And most definitely an indoctrinated murderous nut.
You know very well there is much more to that determination than simply that one phrase.We used to have a policy here, called "Separate but Equal." Would you call that policy racist or identitarian? And no, he DID kill people because of their race, as I'm not so sure one can determine who is an immigrant and who is a citizen simply by looking at them for the time it take to squeeze a trigger.
The issue is, words have meanings. Too many people choose to ignore those meanings and try to define words to suit their purpose.To my thinking basing a view of someone solely upon their membership to an ethnic group is racist. This might be overly simplified but I don't see a reason to complicate the issue here.
Doug
You know very well there is much more to that determination than simply that one phrase.
Very recently you were correcting someone else's misuse of the word racism, and now you are trying to misuse it in a similar way. Since you think the guy was racist, certainly you can point to where he stated that Mexicans, which really aren't a race, are inferior to whites.
I personally haven't read the crap he wrote, and no have interest in doing so.
To my thinking basing a view of someone solely upon their membership to an ethnic group is racist. This might be overly simplified but I don't see a reason to complicate the issue here.
Doug
"This attack is in response to the Hispanic Invasion of Texas." ....... "I am defending my country from the cultural and ethnic replacement brought on by an Invasion."
A few questions:
Which culture and ethnicity, specifically ethnicity, is he speaking about being replaced?
Does he associate Hispanics with having a negative impact on society due to immigration?
I gave it a quick read the other day... Didn’t he say illegals?
I’m pretty sure there was a part about acknowledging immigrants helped to build this country.
Wait what? You think the shooter was more motivated by population control than racism?
"This attack is in response to the Hispanic Invasion of Texas." ....... "I am defending my country from the cultural and ethnic replacement brought on by an Invasion."
A few questions:
Which culture and ethnicity, specifically ethnicity, is he speaking about being replaced?
Does he associate Hispanics with having a negative impact on society due to immigration?
...A hundred or so years ago, this guy would have been shooting up Irish.