I've got a $1000 that says your full of s***. I have the perfect liquor store in mind.
For $500 more, you could choose your finish - plus a meth hooker while your waiting.
Why is your Avatar yelling at me?
I've got a $1000 that says your full of s***. I have the perfect liquor store in mind.
That place is overpriced, staff is unfriendly, and I've heard that they're holding a bunch of rifles people have paid for and are not delivering them. That place had a good thing going with some quality LR stuff. They've run their business into the ground by hiring dumb asses, and changing their model from a customer service POV to an ignore everyone and be @$$hat type of business. Sorry, but the first few times in there it seemed they were GTG. They are a far cry from that now.
That place is overpriced, staff is unfriendly, and I've heard that they're holding a bunch of rifles people have paid for and are not delivering them. That place had a good thing going with some quality LR stuff. They've run their business into the ground by hiring dumb asses, and changing their model from a customer service POV to an ignore everyone and be @$$hat type of business. Sorry, but the first few times in there it seemed they were GTG. They are a far cry from that now.
The only GRRRR I experienced was that Tomlinson's would only let me buy 1 box of 9mm (I needed 100 rounds and didn't feel like breaking out the Dillon) so I just left it there since I would have had to still load 50. Might as well load them all.
Your absolutely correct, my words were not edited but the interview was. I actually did talk about the gun show loop hole as everyone refers to and how private sales do not only happen at gun shows without background checks.
People somehow think I'm anti gun because I support a background check on all firearms purchases. I guess I don't see why.
Let's look at facts.
1. Any individual can sell a firearm to another individual without any kind of background check.
2. This means that a person who is unlawful to purchase or possess a firearm could purchase one from a law abiding individual without any way of stopping the sale.
3. This also means that someone unlawful to possess a firearm can sell a law abiding individual a firearm without the law abiding buyer knowing.
Now a universal background check system will not stop all firearms from changing hands between criminals, but it would prevent #2 and #3. How can that be seen as a bad idea? I would like to see a background check done for every firearms purchase with no restrictions for legal gun owners and a minimum 10 year sentence without early release for any felon caught with a firearm.
I think the minimum sentencing would be more of a deterrent for criminals even though it may only sway a few and the background check system would protect you from selling a firearm to a felon and prevent you from buying a firearm from a felon.
So tell me how this is a bad thing?
Do any of you really think that the 2nd amendment allows anyone to possess a firearm no matter if he is law abiding or a felon, because it seems many people think they should be able to buy a firearm from or sell a firearm to anyone they want to.
Would you really have a clear heart knowing that you sold a firearm to a felon or is it okay as long as you don't know anything about the person? (What I don't know won't hurt me)
What if you bought the firearm only to find out later that the seller was a felon and the firearm was used in a murder and now your a suspect and have to prove you bought it from someone else? Imagine the hassle and the loss of the firearm and money you would be out.
6 month necroposting is amateurish.
6 month necroposting is amateurish.