Is this the same as the 'gay cake' lawsuit? Yes/no? Does the 20 year old have any case based upon 'age discriminating'?
Dunno why there is much argument or discussion about this?
Dicks threw pro 2A folks under the bus after Sandyhook, PUBLICLY caving in to the gun grabbers wishes.
There shouldn't have been any discussion after that debacle years ago, yet here we are again.
Maybe if we'd have ALL followed through, Dicks wouldn't have the large voice they do now?
Not sure about a large voice. Only reason they have any voice at all is because of the anti gun, liberal media
A lot of gun owners support Dicks with their dollars. Some out of negligence, some out of greed.
Without gun owner support, would Dicks still be in business?
Yeah. I'm betting the markup on yoga pants and soccer gear is probably significantly higher than on shotguns.
A lot of gun owners support Dicks with their dollars. Some out of negligence, some out of greed.
Without gun owner support, would Dicks still be in business?
Yeah...golfers, fishermen, youth league sports, fudds, and butters....there's probably more than enough that either don't care about your ability to buy an "assault weapon" or just don't stay informed about who's caving to what interest group to keep them in plenty of business.
Actually yes they do Tights with nice big belt loops so you can carry.Yeah, but what about the gun owners that wear yoga pants? Does 511 make tactical yoga pants?
Ethically and economically, I believe it is. It's the same "we sell widgets, but we won't sell widgets to you" argument I've put forward several times.
Legally, I've no idea. Instead of a blanket law of "if you offer a widget for $5, you sell to everyone willing to give you $5 for a widget" we have protected classes who you can't refuse widgets to based on their membership/status of whatever class. I don't think age discrimination for being too young puts you in one of those classes. Age discrimination, at least as far as employment, is only for "you're too old" cases.
Is this the same as the 'gay cake' lawsuit? Yes/no? Does the 20 year old have any case based upon 'age discriminating'?
While federal age discrimination laws and those in most states apply only to people over 40, Oregon’s law generally prohibits age discrimination against the selling of goods to anyone above the age of 18, said John Donohue, a professor at Stanford Law School.
The law provides that “all persons … are entitled to the full and equal accommodations, advantages, facilities and privileges of any place of public accommodation, without any distinction, discrimination or restriction on account of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, national origin, marital status or age if the individual is of age, as described in this section, or older.”
Discriminating on the basis of age is no more acceptable under the law than discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation. And that’s exactly what retailers have proposed to do by saying they’ll sell a rifle to someone who’s 21, but not someone who’s 20.
Now that is funny right there. Progressives get bitten by their own law.Turns out in Oregon, he probably does.