And still my favorite, a young teen mom in Oklahoma kills one of two intruders to protect her baby after calling 911. The second intruder is charged with the murder of the first.
Okla. Woman Shoots, Kills Intruder: 911 Operators Say It's OK to Shoot - ABC News
[FONT="]They stalked her for two years, poisoned her kennel of police dogs, murdered her litters of puppies, broke in multiple times while she was off shopping for baby food/diapers.[/FONT][FONT="]She had bred, trained, and sold German Shepard dogs to Law Enforcement agencies, until all dogs were killed by the two scum drug bums.
Ohio County, IN – A heroic woman who came to the aid of a police officer under attack has been hit with a lawsuit.
Kystie Jaehnen was hailed as a hero after she saved the life of an Indiana conservation officer who had been overtaken by a drug-fueled assailant. But now she has become the focus of a wrongful death lawsuit, according to an Aurora Police Department (APD) sergeant familiar with the case.
This one's from Indiana, and of course involves a lawsuit.
Hero Who Shot Man Trying To Kill Cop Gets Sued By Criminal's Family
Guy Relford is now representing her. He announced it yesterday.
This one's from Indiana, and of course involves a lawsuit.
Hero Who Shot Man Trying To Kill Cop Gets Sued By Criminal's Family
Guy Relford is now representing her. He announced it yesterday.
Dang desperate slimeball contingency lawyers...they're just money-hungry sonsofbi...wait...
Nevermind.
Seems like an easy case. I can't really see a situation where anyone takes the side of the attacker's family.
Judge should shame them out of the courtroom.
No.
They should pay a fine.
Strongly agree with this. Only way to stop BS lawsuits like this is to create a penalty when you lose.
Doesn’t this seem like a reasonable lawsuit? A man died, depending on the circumstances of the altercation she may or may not have used excessive force. Take it to court and let a jury decide seems like a reasonable course of action to me.
Comment on Reddit:
What is this, the UK?
Is she expected to try and make a non-lethal shot with the gun?
Comment on Reddit:
What is this, the UK?
Is she expected to try and make a non-lethal shot with the gun?
That statement is one of the anti-gunner's favorites.
Cause they don't know what they are talking about.
Oh, and part of that fine should be to the lawyers that promulgated it.
I don't necessarily agree to a fine "if you lose".
I could have a legitimate complaint and lose.
But, when they sue knowing the law says that they can't, and do anyway... Doesn't Indiana have a law supposed to protect people that lawfully used their gun?
Oh, and part of that fine should be to the lawyers that promulgated it.
Comment on Reddit:
What is this, the UK?
Is she expected to try and make a non-lethal shot with the gun?
That statement is one of the anti-gunner's favorites.
Cause they don't know what they are talking about.
Yep. The man died because of his own actions. Especially in the act of taking control of the officer's weapon, that's a deadly situation and she was right in doing what she did.
...
Yes shooting to wound is one of their favorite, I didn't see it in that quote though.
..
It was in the quote that I responded to.