If some serrations are good, more serrations are extra good.
That gun would either be a safe queen, or owned by someone who liked to clean guns often.
Thanks for using the words "cool" and "Glock" in the same sentence Allen
I concur that the spacing of the ports should align with the serrations. That is just more pleasing to the eye.
Along those same lines (pardon the pun) consider the Rule of Thirds.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_thirds
And the related Golden Ratio:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio
If you had serrations (or some other visual cue) "cover" the last 1/3 of the slide, then the ports could be the 1/3 of that space. That mondo-serration posted by ITF wouldn't appear that jarring if the creator had stuck with 1/3 segments (not mathematically derived, but something close). I actually like the longitudinal lines on a slide... but that is truly over-done.
I'm wanting to do a Glock with kind of an old school smithing look with lots of large checkering. 10 to 15 lines per inch. Maybe run some serrations through the checkering. I want to diamond checker the whole slide and frame. I'm thinking a laser engraver for the frame and mill the checkering on the slide. The fewest lpi checkering file I can find is 20 and I'm wanting the diamonds bigger. I'll donate ideas slides and cash to experiment with.
Not to the level you describe, but these look somewhat interesting... though could get rough on clothing or skin that could come in contact, depending on how sharp the edges are.
Not to the level you describe, but these look somewhat interesting... though could get rough on clothing or skin that could come in contact, depending on how sharp the edges are.
I might now be in the market for a glock. I love this