Have you actually read Orwell or does it just sound cool to you?
Legitimate question, btw. Curious which book you are referring to and what parallels you see based on his work.Have you actually read Orwell or does it just sound cool to you?
If, by legitimate, you mean elementary and obvious, then yeah, sure.Legitimate question, btw. Curious which book you are referring to and what parallels you see based on his work.
Hmmmm...I missed the part in 1984 (the elementary and obvious comparison, I guess?) about vaccines. Have you all read it? Do you know what the book is even about?If, by legitimate, you mean elementary and obvious, then yeah, sure.
It is funny how you seem to think you are the only one that has read it and yet somehow you missed the central theme of a central power dictating everything and trampling individual liberty, freedom and choice.Hmmmm...I missed the part in 1984 (the elementary and obvious comparison, I guess?) about vaccines. Have you all read it? Do you know what the book is even about?
Gimme a minute. I’ll go read it. brb…..Have you actually read Orwell or does it just sound cool to you?
Sonny, I can tell you one thing....you certainly do not sound cool to me.Have you actually read Orwell or does it just sound cool to you?
People say this whole pandemic/vaccination situation is all a plot to make money for Big Pharma. This person is saying they’re going to pull the vaccines soon? I doubt that.While you're all reading stuff; What is your opinion of this article: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...mT7fBqYy_JvP8YNBJwUMpg9yUK2g-Co89yC_eHZ7EDia0
I do not know what to think of it.
I appreciate your feedback. I can imagine your "day job" might be rather frustrating in todays world. But the above quote is hard to put faith in. When the CDC claims, "...vaccines reduce deaths by half." or "Chances of death are increased 300% for the unvaccinated." they leave out any context. The data they cite show deaths reduced from two to one. Or the chances of death increase from .004% to .012%. When deciding between an allograft or autograft for my knee reconstruction, the surgeons sales pitch was, "The chance of disease transmission with an allograft may be one in a million. But if it happens to you, it's one hundred percent." I went with the autograft. I guess my point is statistics can be both true and deceptive.Vaccines work at reducing death, that's about it.
1984 was a very boring read by my estimation. But if you cannot see the thematic parallel to todays world, the issue isn't the book. I might recommend Harrison Bergeron as another story that seemingly foretells the future. And it's a much shorter read.Hmmmm...I missed the part in 1984 (the elementary and obvious comparison, I guess?) about vaccines. Have you all read it? Do you know what the book is even about?
While you're all reading stuff; What is your opinion of this article: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...mT7fBqYy_JvP8YNBJwUMpg9yUK2g-Co89yC_eHZ7EDia0
I do not know what to think of it.
I did this past summer again. I own it. If you are so blinded by your bias to not see sone parallels to the theme of the book, there’s no point in even continuing any conversation with you.I think some of you got triggered. It really is a great book...you guys should read it sometime!