Coronavirus III is it racist...
I like that for the new thread
Thanks for telling me. U already started 3.
Too late. We are already on Page 17. You were missed.
Coronavirus III is it racist...
I like that for the new thread
Thanks for telling me. U already started 3.
You can in California, they like to bleach theirs.I've heard you can get it bleached too.
21 posts past due for lock down...are we waiting for another Holcomb executive order?
1430 hours tomorrow.21 posts past due for lock down...are we waiting for another Holcomb executive order?
I think we're waiting for CM to wake from his afternoon nap...
Too late. We are already on Page 17. You were missed.
So. What 'I' call it doesn't matter, but what some other 'I' calls it does? Not sure how that makes sense, or is there a numerical threshold where a sufficient number of 'I's then have an effect. Sounds like racism is quantized. Who knew?
If you die, we’re splitting up your gear. And if you’re healthy, we may smoke you to preserve the meat until the processing plants reopen. Long Pig for eryone.What happened to no man left behind. I guess in these uncertain times all bets are off
What happened to no man left behind. I guess in these uncertain times all bets are off
Wait til we see his gear...NRA4EVER, We are playing over here: https://www.indianagunowners.com/forums/break-room/480043-coronavirus-iii.html#post8260352
its a midget chicken, or an obese pigeon.Hold on a minute....I need to argue with my wife about whether a cornish hen is a chicken.
I think we're waiting for CM to wake from his afternoon nap...
Yes, it’s called hot dogs, or bologna.Is a pig's ass pork?
So your response is that there is no racism, that all of those 650 reports (as of two weeks ago) are false? You instead want an anecdote naming a particular person?
[Correlation without causation, unless you can cite empirical evidence connecting the persons perpetrating the 650 incidents with themselves calling it Wuhan or Chinese virus or being affected by hearing others so call it. Were any perps charged and/or questioned about their motivations? If not, how do we know their impression that people of Chinese extraction were responsible for their problems was caused by sentence construction rather than any portion of the mountains of evidence that the Chinese government is at fault and the populace may have acquiesced?]
How about Thomas Robb? He prefers the term "Chinese virus." If he has an opinion outside the norm, my knee-jerk reaction is going to be the opposite.
[One wonders if you were similarly bunched at the ChiCom official who said in Xinhua that if we weren't sufficiently nice to the CCP that they would withhold medicines and supplies and let " ...the United States would sink into the hell of a novel coronavirus epidemic." Please point me to your post that threatening to use the epidemic as a tool of state does not make that state worthy of our revulsion]
Even President Trump dropped the geographical designation, regularly just calling it the coronavirus.
I think it is worse and has some negative implications. I stated that opinion. I gave reasons why I hold that opinion. To me, worse with negative
implications without some decent reason makes it not a valid construction; to me it's a problematic construction.
[I wish I could be more surprised at seeing the use of that word. Sigh]
When I first spoke up on the topic, I figured that people who were calling it "Wuhan flu" were doing so without malice, and I tried to indicate that. I didn't make any accusations. I certainly didn't try to
come across as scolding anyone.
[Fail]
I said that it's better for INGO if we use the widespread terminology rather than terminology that seems to put blame on a subset of people. (A subset, by the way, who were themselves ravaged by Covid-19 and who live under government oppression that makes our current situation here seem like liberty and prosperity.) I still think that is true.
[These mental gymnastics apparently make sense to you, fine. Where you go off the rails is insisting that the way you think you should act should influence others because; reasons. Personally, I just hear SJW blather. Do you use terms like 'Syrian refugees' and if so, why? Is it accurate to simply broadly label them by their country of origin? Worse yet do you use Syrian rebels or Houthi insurgents? Then your reductio is already absurdum]
It sure seems to matter to some people here that they get to use whatever wording they want without even the slightest challenge to their thinking.
Yes, it’s called hot dogs, or bologna.