Hey, speaker: I thought that the RFRA statutes as originally passed were just fine as they were, too. But you let a vocal minority of bullies force you to change them. So, how about listening to a far larger plurality of your constituents regarding the unconstitutional criminalization of carrying handguns?
My concerns include but are not limited to the fact that they are repealing the law requiring a LTCH, but are instituting a Firearms Reciprocity License, which we would have to pay to obtain if we wished to carry in other states. The cost of the FRL would be $40 for the Lifetime, if one already has a LTCH. I would favor the LTCH remaining the form issued by the state, since that's what everyone has, and just remove the requirement to be issued one.
Yeah, this is my hangup too. If you are going to make it free to carry, no license required, why should I have to pay the state (again) to prove to other states that I can carry? I've paid my money once, I really don't want to pay again. Just slip it in that anyone with a current license (either limited or lifetime) is proof of the right to carry for safe of reciprocity with other states.
Any existing lifetime licenses would automatically become the new "reciprocity" license. if the law gets passed as written,our current license (shall issue, no training requirement, lifetime) would merely become optional, for reciprocity purposes, but not be mandatory for in state, lawful carry.Yeah, this is my hangup too. If you are going to make it free to carry, no license required, why should I have to pay the state (again) to prove to other states that I can carry? I've paid my money once, I really don't want to pay again. Just slip it in that anyone with a current license (either limited or lifetime) is proof of the right to carry for safe of reciprocity with other states.
Any existing lifetime licenses would automatically become the new "reciprocity" license. if the law gets passed as written,our current license (shall issue, no training requirement, lifetime) would merely become optional, for reciprocity purposes, but not be mandatory for in state, lawful carry.
Write and call.
Yeah, I think the republicans want to keep their hands clean. It's up to us to hold their feet to the fire. Whether they can keep their hands clean in the process is their problem. Their careers are of no concern to me. They were elected to faithfully uphold the constitution. If they fail, then they are useless.
Who do I call, email, snail-mail to do my part? Also are there any prefab template letters floating around.
Sounds like the same crap stance he took in the previous session.
Hey, speaker: I thought that the RFRA statutes as originally passed were just fine as they were, too. But you let a vocal minority of bullies force you to change them. So, how about listening to a far larger plurality of your constituents regarding the unconstitutional criminalization of carrying handguns?
According to this story Indiana lawmakers file bills to make guns easier to buy, carry | Fox 59...
Yeah, this is my hangup too. If you are going to make it free to carry, no license required, why should I have to pay the state (again) to prove to other states that I can carry? I've paid my money once, I really don't want to pay again. Just slip it in that anyone with a current license (either limited or lifetime) is proof of the right to carry for safe of reciprocity with other states.