A scientist having an incorrect hypothesis doesn't make you a turd. Trying to stop any debate about said hypothesis does. Testing and challenging a hypothesis is what science is all about.Scientists and Media were complete turds, even in 1978.
That is because they know almost nothing for fact about it, less than we know about the moon…Nobody talks about the earth's core very much...
The moon is green cheese. We've known that for a long time.That is because they know almost nothing for fact about it, less than we know about the moon…
A scientist having an incorrect hypothesis doesn't make you a turd. Trying to stop any debate about said hypothesis does. Testing and challenging a hypothesis is what science is all about.
The ironic thing is, those that call others science deniers are in fact the science deniers.
Scientists who censor the ones that don’tAgreed.
However,
Scientists disregarding data because it weakens their hypotheses........... are turds.
Scientists who claim their hypotheses are "uncontestable", because they're the scientists.........are turds.
Scientists who claim "the science is settled"........... are turds.
Scientists who slant their results to fit the narrative desired by the sponsor of their grants........are turds.
Which all falls under the science denier accusers, so I'm not sure why the however.Agreed.
However,
Scientists disregarding data because it weakens their hypotheses........... are turds.
Scientists who claim their hypotheses are "uncontestable", because they're the scientists.........are turds.
Scientists who claim "the science is settled"........... are turds.
Scientists who slant their results to fit the narrative desired by the sponsor of their grants........are turds.