After he rounds up and puts all the treasonist bass tards in some far away gulag!Then Trump should do the same thing Biden did. Day one have a stack of EOs ready to sign to wipe all that nonsense away.
After he rounds up and puts all the treasonist bass tards in some far away gulag!Then Trump should do the same thing Biden did. Day one have a stack of EOs ready to sign to wipe all that nonsense away.
Obviously Congress should be doing this if it is going to be done.I wish I understood this process better but the talking heads seem to say it is not that simple, and I suspect it is not. A practical side of me says it would be whiplash to go back and forth on on what congress should have legislated…
If the EO is an executive policy, perhaps “trans everything good”, those are easily. This wetlands stuff doesn’t seem so easily reversed. I am certainly no expert on EO’s but I believe that to create the EO on wetlands is just a dictate, but to rescind it requires hearings etc.Obviously Congress should be doing this if it is going to be done.
I'd like to know why it wouldn't be that easy. It was surely that easy in 2021.
Ah, yeah. They will be going through that to create that as well. That makes senseIf the EO is an executive policy, perhaps “trans everything good”, those are easily. This wetlands stuff doesn’t seem so easily reversed. I am certainly no expert on EO’s but I believe that to create the EO on wetlands is just a dictate, but to rescind it requires hearings etc.
And that was a perfectly acceptable choice with few unwanted consequences. I don't know what is behind the expansion of such PFAS impregnated packaging, I just think it is unwise. The idea that greasy food shouldn't mean greasy packaging seems like much ado about nothing and maybe shouldn't generate that much concern given their prevalence and persistence in the environment. Perhaps limit usage to more important areas such as surgical implements and sterile packaging
Because it was nearby, I remember when discovery in a lawsuit revealed that DuPont had been knowingly polluting water supplies in Parkersburg WVa with PFOA since the early 1980s and had known no later than 1993 via their own captive studies that the chemical was a carcinogen for testicular, pancreatic and liver tumors in lab animals yet elected to keep using it because the products they made with it were worth $1 billion per year to the bottom line. When 3M phased out production they began manufacturing their own supply
I'm not really a believer that feeding mice doses of contaminants far over what they likely could ever accumulate in their lifetimes in order to speed up the appearance any deleterious effects is a valid methodology but neither would I willingly drink even small amounts on a regular basis. Dumping industrial waste in waterways (or indeed injecting it into the ground like PG&E) and then pretending that's the end of any concern is not good stewardship or good business practice
I just ordered a couple of leather belts, a nice Ariat belt that came in a clear plastic sleeve loose in an Amazon box, that also contained a $15 cheapo that came in an attractive box, rolled in a nice cloth bag both with manufacturer logos. Which was the better experience to receive?You might be surprised how badly manufacturers react to grease stains on the outside of packaging like doughnut boxes, even butter and margarine stick cartons.
Packaging can mean both everything and nothing. I remember an executive from Elizabeth Arden cosmetics giving us a project and telling us that she wanted the Elizabeth Arden experience to start when the customer picked up the box. There was no other direction. I thought about that on the way home and asked the gardener about EA cosmetics and their relative position in that market. The overprint varnish we made for that had micronized teflon combined with high weight silicone that gave the carton a smooth matte finish that felt like velvet. Not cheap at all, but it was exactly what the customer was looking for even though they did not know it at the time. That was a case where the box meant a great deal.
I can certainly see a situation like that being important to the customer. A McDonalds French fry box, not so much, and the French fry box leads to a great deal more exposure than a high end make-up box as wellYou might be surprised how badly manufacturers react to grease stains on the outside of packaging like doughnut boxes, even butter and margarine stick cartons.
Packaging can mean both everything and nothing. I remember an executive from Elizabeth Arden cosmetics giving us a project and telling us that she wanted the Elizabeth Arden experience to start when the customer picked up the box. There was no other direction. I thought about that on the way home and asked the gardener about EA cosmetics and their relative position in that market. The overprint varnish we made for that had micronized teflon combined with high weight silicone that gave the carton a smooth matte finish that felt like velvet. Not cheap at all, but it was exactly what the customer was looking for even though they did not know it at the time. That was a case where the box meant a great deal.
Perception is everything…EA didn't want their product thought of as greasy, maybe McDonalds has the same desire but I doubt any sort of packaging will change people's expectations all that much
Perception is everything…
I can certainly see a situation like that being important to the customer. A McDonalds French fry box, not so much, and the French fry box leads to a great deal more exposure than a high end make-up box as well
EA didn't want their product thought of as greasy, maybe McDonalds has the same desire but I doubt any sort of packaging will change people's expectations all that much
I bet if they checked our southern border, they could find a lot of guys named "Jesus". Maybe they could hire them to walk out there and fix 'em!Boy, I’ll bet that floating on water aspect will make it easier to repair them.
Hey, Act - where do you keep the Mk48s?
So could USS Barb, with Admiral Fluckey's commando team.overkill
a simple 5 inch gun on a destroyer could take care of that, without breaking a sweat.
So could USS Barb, with Admiral Fluckey's commando team.
WWHGRD?By the way.
If you submit an order for a submarine deck gun for your nuke submarine... people get REALLY upset.
No humor at all.