You reasonably concluded an implication from what it seemed I was saying, I even told you so.
The fact that I guessed right is not evidence that you reasoned well. I guessed right because I heard it before. I was a Christian for 40+ years. I've heard what you've asserted many times about Islam. In those days I believed that Satan inspired Mohamed to write what he wrote. I've made the same arguments you have. I guess right because I've used nearly the very same language myself.
That's the only relevant thing you've achieved from skimming and chattering about everything but this topic, and most everyone else already got that part. It was obvious.
I wanted you to explicitly commit to what you're saying. You did.
You made an assertion that Mohamed was inspired by an angel of Satan. That is absolutely on topic. It's reasonable for people to dispute that because it's based on your faith, not on facts. If we're going to bring in the possibility supernatural causes, why does it have to be the enemy of Jesus?. One could argue the same way that it was the enemies of Prometheus that put Mohamed up to it. It's fine and well that you live by faith, but in a religious discussion thread, other people get to rebut what you say. A faith based argument requires circular reasoning.
Send some Muslims please, I prefer to challenge and be challenged. You can't do that.
As I said, you can walk away from it without answering. But it doesn't matter who or how you want to be challenged. You make a statement holier than swiss cheese on a public forum you shouldn't expect that people won't disagree.