So in other words, no citation; no proof to back what you say. Just the assertions that 1) you're right, and 2) the attorneys who have previously posted on this matter right here on INGO are wrong, and my personal attorney is wrong.
Maybe you should go teach a course at IU School of Law.
Ok, you keep using this "citation" reference.... Trespassing is a criminal charge, so "citation" isn't the preferred nomenclature. It's a charge, validated by PC, a "citation" is of a lower standard.
secondly, lawyers argue the law, they don't decide it. If you have one lawyer arguing one way, then obviously one is arguing the other way.... so based on that alone lawyers are wrong 50% of the time, right?
Who's to say that your lawyer isn't typically on the "bad end" of that 50%?
The proff I have is in the act of removing such individuals that chose to ignore such signs. This is a well held course of action. A course of action that has yet to meet with a challenge. Take it for what it's worth, but I know who won't put this issue to the test....
(hint: that would be you)