Who's worse? The Homeowner suing because Pizza Hut sent a man with a gun to their home.
Or the Family for suing Pizza Hut. Personally I think once you leave Pizza Hut's parking lot in your own car. You're no longer subject to their property rights/rules. Why does posing a question about personal security & responsibility have to be "liberal" in terms of who's at fault on one side of the coin or the other.
I'd say stripping someone of the right to take their own security in their own hands is far more liberal than using litigation to call them on it after the fact.
Or the Family for suing Pizza Hut. Personally I think once you leave Pizza Hut's parking lot in your own car. You're no longer subject to their property rights/rules. Why does posing a question about personal security & responsibility have to be "liberal" in terms of who's at fault on one side of the coin or the other.
I'd say stripping someone of the right to take their own security in their own hands is far more liberal than using litigation to call them on it after the fact.