You have to be careful about all those things because they're "hidden". Who uncovered them? Are they just gaslighting? How did the sources that reveal all the hidden stuff discover the truth? Is it credible? Can you verify the information they gave you yourself?
Hidden histories: if you can't verify it independently, yet you believe the hidden history "revealed", maybe you fell for something.
True intent: This is never knowable unless the person reveals it in a credible way, for example, admitting to it when they didn't think unintended people were listening.
False narratives: This is at least possible to uncover often enough. For example, the news reporting "hands up, don't shoot" which they're still putting forward even after the eye witness admitted to police that it really didn't happen that way.
Ok "veiled". And just so we are absolutely clear I stated it was my biased opinion. For my opinion to change I need "verified evidence" or a compelling argument to the opposite of my opinion. Haven't heard one yet so continue to pick nits. I now you are intelligent enough to understand what I meant and you like to present ( on occasion) disagreement with either side (a good thing). But my opinion stands, both sides are guilty, and of far more than the media presents.