Did Trump win Indiana? If so, the arguments against Biden within this state are moot.
Did Trump win Indiana? If so, the arguments against Biden within this state are moot.
Did Trump win Indiana? If so, the arguments against voting for Biden within this state are moot.
Where is the Hunter Biden expose'? Rudy had an incredible amount of information he was going to use to PROVE Joe Biden did something to someone for some reason. Where is it?
Where are the watermarked ballots?
Where is Hugo Chavez?
You see a trend here? These topics are from a body of people who live in fear. And believe anyone who promotes stories with little to no proof.
Months have gone by. Rudy seems to be in the middle of most of these things....and we continue to get nothing burgers.
There isn't anything to debate. Fairy tales. Mostly from a little boy who cried "Wolf" far too often.
Did Trump win Indiana? If so, the arguments against voting for Biden within this state are moot.
Where is the Hunter Biden expose'? Rudy had an incredible amount of information he was going to use to PROVE Joe Biden did something to someone for some reason. Where is it?
Where are the watermarked ballots?
Where is Hugo Chavez?
You see a trend here? These topics are from a body of people who live in fear. And believe anyone who promotes stories with little to no proof.
Months have gone by. Rudy seems to be in the middle of most of these things....and we continue to get nothing burgers.
There isn't anything to debate. Fairy tales. Mostly from a little boy who cried "Wolf" far too often.
Yeah. It is how it works. Republicans win Indiana. Biden-shaming anyone within Indiana isn't very useful. They didn't elect Joe. It's those "other" states and those "other" voters who did.
Popular vote for president is meaningless, remember?
What does that have to do with the $200 gun/magazine tax?
It shouldn't start drama, have a feeling it would. Alpo sort of addressed it I guess. Didn't address the gun tax but whatever.Asking specific people a question shouldn't start drama. If anything, it should begin the conversation you are wanting to have, and if not, you wouldn't have to keep asking.
What it has to do with gun rights is twofold:
1) Blaming Kut or Paul for holding a position that affects your gun rights within Indiana should Joe Biden be the new president doesn't make any sense if, in fact, Indiana's EC vote goes 100% to Trump. It is a moot argument. Philosophically interesting, but moot in reality.
2) You folks....and that is most of you....have been promoting conspiracies based on fear for months. Hunter Biden, Fraud at the ballot box, Kraken-level conspiracies....only, time and time again to come up short. And, when asked by a judge who requires you to testify under oath....no facts.
So, please excuse me for not believing all of this folderol.
Don't blame your diabetes on me if I eat a Snickers.
The counter-argument you propose doesn't wash. No disrespect intended.
I guess that assumes I voted for Biden.
Or that I voted at all.
A vote FOR someone is support, you can't spin it any other way. Nobody forced you to fill in the circle.
"Indiana didn't go biden" is a copout, cognitive dissonance.
Stand proud behind your decision, own it.
"I voted for hitler and his policy of genocide, but he didn't win, so it's ok right?!"
I guess it just won't effect Indiana! Whew, that was close, could you imagine if bidet had won Indiana?
Then we would have had something to worry about. Even though he had a lot of support here, we're in the clear baby!
What it has to do with gun rights is twofold:
1) Blaming Kut or Paul for holding a position that affects your gun rights within Indiana should Joe Biden be the new president doesn't make any sense if, in fact, Indiana's EC vote goes 100% to Trump. It is a moot argument. Philosophically interesting, but moot in reality.
2) You folks....and that is most of you....have been promoting conspiracies based on fear for months. Hunter Biden, Fraud at the ballot box, Kraken-level conspiracies....only, time and time again to come up short. And, when asked by a judge who requires you to testify under oath....no facts.
So, please excuse me for not believing all of this folderol.
2) You folks....and that is most of you....have been promoting conspiracies based on fear for months. Hunter Biden, Fraud at the ballot box, Kraken-level conspiracies....only, time and time again to come up short. And, when asked by a judge who requires you to testify under oath....no facts.
So Biden's gun plans are "folderol"?
Pretty broad generalization. To say that fraud exists in our voting system is not a conspiracy; it's literally been proven in this election with several dead people on the voting register (Not to mention sworn affidavit testimony).
Now, to say that enough fraud occurred that Biden won the swing states is more of a stretch which hasn't been proven.
This is the long game playing out. Trump has got to show that (at least some) fraud exists, even if it may not have been the sole reason he lost, so that going forward people don't just shut up and believe what big brother says.
It's also worth noting that Trump has no reason to concede. He's spent the last four years fighting what has essentially been the Democrat party's refusal to accept the election.
It's also worth mentioning that the election isn't even over! It's not over until the EC submits their votes.
So relax about the tinfoil hat wearers. It's ok for people to be afraid of the government.