The F we will.
Isn’t this the model they try to use on gun companies, not sue the product, but the advertising?The state of Kansas filed an explosive consumer-protection lawsuit against Pfizer last week full of accusations that the pharmaceutical giant misled the public on the safety and efficacy of its Covid-19 vaccine.
Kansas is accusing Pfizer of knowingly misleading the public about the adverse effects of its coronavirus vaccine and manipulating its vaccine-safety trials in violation of state consumer-protection law and previous consent judgements. The lawsuit cites interviews, press releases, internal documents, scientific research, government research, news reporting, and other sources of information to back up its incendiary claims.
“Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was safe even though it knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis, failed pregnancies, and deaths. Pfizer concealed this critical safety information from the public,” the lawsuit asserts.”
Kansas AG Sues Pfizer For Rigging Clinical Trials | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
Were gun companies hiding information from the public in their advertising though?Isn’t this the model they try to use on gun companies, not sue the product, but the advertising?
As I read it they are not going after the drug for failure, but rather the statements the manufacturer made which I equated to advertising which likely falls out of the EUA protection just as they say misleading gun marketing falls out of the gun companies protections…Were gun companies hiding information from the public in their advertising though?
A true analog would be if a gun company knew that one of their guns was prone to exploding under normal use, but hid that from the public.